OpenTelemetry Collector deployment, instrumentation (Java/Python/Node.js/.NET/Go), and OTTL pipeline transforms for Coralogix — coralogix exporter config, Helm chart selection, Kubernetes topology, ECS/EKS/GKE deployments, SDK setup, APM transactions, and OTTL cardinality/PII/routing.
92
96%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
92%
1.10xAverage score across 127 eval scenarios
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
{
"context": "Evaluating a Coralogix support response for this user question:\n\nWe set up the Coralogix Linux host integration with a filelog receiver. To route logs from different files to different Coralogix subsystems, we added an operator that sets cx.application.name and cx.subsystem.name as resource attributes on each log record. The operators are definitely running — we can see the attributes in the debug exporter output. But all logs arrive in Coralogix under the global application_name and subsystem_name values hardcoded in the exporter block. The per-file attributes are completely ignored. What's wrong?",
"type": "weighted_checklist",
"checklist": [
{
"name": "mentions-application-name-attributes",
"description": "The response contains \"application_name_attributes\" (case-sensitive).",
"max_score": 3
},
{
"name": "mentions-subsystem-name-attributes",
"description": "The response contains \"subsystem_name_attributes\" (case-sensitive).",
"max_score": 3
},
{
"name": "no-says-to-rename-the-operator-output-keys-or",
"description": "Explains that the coralogix exporter only does dynamic resource-attribute routing when application_name_attributes and subsystem_name_attributes are explicitly listed in the exporter config — and that a hardcoded application_name value takes precedence over the attribute lookup unless the attributes list is configured. The fix is to add application_name_attributes: [cx.application.name] (and the subsystem equivalent) to the exporter block. A response that says to rename the operator output keys, or that focuses only on \"set the resource attribute\" without mentioning these two exporter fields, is a FAIL.",
"max_score": 2
}
]
}.claude-plugin
.codex-plugin
.cursor-plugin
evals
scenario-1
scenario-2
scenario-3
scenario-4
scenario-5
scenario-6
scenario-7
scenario-8
scenario-9
scenario-10
scenario-11
scenario-12
scenario-13
scenario-14
scenario-15
scenario-16
scenario-17
scenario-18
scenario-19
scenario-20
scenario-21
scenario-22
scenario-23
scenario-24
scenario-25
scenario-26
scenario-27
scenario-28
scenario-29
scenario-30
scenario-31
scenario-32
scenario-33
scenario-34
scenario-35
scenario-36
scenario-37
scenario-38
scenario-39
scenario-40
scenario-41
scenario-42
scenario-43
scenario-44
scenario-45
scenario-46
scenario-47
scenario-48
scenario-49
scenario-50
scenario-51
scenario-52
scenario-53
scenario-54
scenario-55
scenario-56
scenario-57
scenario-58
scenario-59
scenario-60
scenario-61
scenario-62
scenario-63
scenario-64
scenario-65
scenario-66
scenario-67
scenario-68
scenario-69
scenario-70
scenario-71
scenario-72
scenario-73
scenario-74
scenario-75
scenario-76
scenario-77
scenario-78
scenario-79
scenario-80
scenario-81
scenario-82
scenario-83
scenario-84
scenario-85
scenario-86
scenario-87
scenario-88
scenario-89
scenario-90
scenario-91
scenario-92
scenario-93
scenario-94
scenario-95
scenario-96
scenario-97
scenario-98
scenario-99
scenario-100
scenario-101
scenario-102
scenario-103
scenario-104
scenario-105
scenario-106
scenario-107
scenario-108
scenario-109
scenario-110
scenario-111
scenario-112
scenario-113
scenario-114
scenario-115
scenario-116
scenario-117
scenario-118
scenario-119
scenario-120
scenario-121
scenario-122
scenario-123
scenario-124
scenario-125
scenario-126
scenario-127
skills
opentelemetry
opentelemetry-collector
references
opentelemetry-instrumentation
opentelemetry-ottl