Sync Shared Context Engineering context files with implemented code changes.
73
92%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
—
No eval scenarios have been run
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a strong skill description that clearly articulates what the skill does (scans code changes, classifies significance, updates specific Markdown context files) and when to use it (after implementation tasks, when syncing docs with code, refreshing project context). It uses natural trigger terms and occupies a distinct niche that is unlikely to conflict with other skills.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: scans modified code, classifies change significance, updates/verifies Markdown context files. Also enumerates specific file types: overview, architecture, glossary, patterns, context-map, and domain files under `context/`. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Explicitly answers both 'what' (scans modified code, classifies change significance, updates Markdown context files) and 'when' (starts with 'Use when user wants to update project documentation to reflect code changes, sync docs with code, refresh project context, or keep AI memory files accurate after completing an implementation task'). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes strong natural trigger terms users would say: 'update project documentation', 'sync docs with code', 'refresh project context', 'keep AI memory files accurate', 'implementation task'. These cover multiple natural phrasings a user might use. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Clearly occupies a distinct niche: updating AI memory/context Markdown files under `context/` to stay aligned with code changes. The specific mention of `context/` directory, durable AI memory, and the enumerated file types (overview, architecture, glossary, patterns, context-map, domain files) make it highly distinguishable from general documentation or code skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured, actionable skill that provides clear guidance for syncing project documentation with code changes. Its strengths are the explicit multi-step workflow with decision gates, concrete before/after examples, and specific quality constraints. Minor weaknesses include slight verbosity in places and all content being in a single file rather than leveraging progressive disclosure through bundle files.
Suggestions
Consider extracting the Classification Reference table and Domain File Creation Policy into separate bundle files (e.g., classification-reference.md, domain-file-policy.md) to improve progressive disclosure and reduce the main skill's length.
Tighten the 'Principle' section—Claude doesn't need to be told that context should reflect truth; instead, jump straight to the actionable rules.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is mostly efficient and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but some sections are slightly verbose—e.g., the 'Principle' section states obvious things, and the classification table could be tighter. The domain file creation policy has some redundancy across bullet points. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides a concrete step-by-step workflow, a clear classification table with specific examples, a before/after example showing exactly what files to create/update and what content they should contain, and specific constraints (250 lines, relative paths, Mermaid diagrams). This is highly actionable guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 9-step workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit decision points (classify → verify → edit or skip → create domain files → update context-map → glossary → final check). The final check step serves as a validation checkpoint, and the significance gating provides a clear decision framework. The 'final-task requirement' adds an additional verification loop. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill uses internal anchor links (e.g., [Classification Reference], [Domain File Policy]) for navigation within the document, which is good structure. However, with no bundle files, all content is inline in a single file. The content is moderately long and could benefit from splitting the classification reference and domain file policy into separate referenced files. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
Reviewed
Table of Contents