This is an excellent skill description that clearly articulates what the skill does (creates structured handover documents with specific content elements), where it saves output, and when it should be triggered. It uses third person voice correctly, provides rich natural trigger terms, and includes explicit example phrases that users would naturally say. The description is comprehensive yet concise with no vague fluff.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'Creates a structured handover document summarizing task context, decisions made, open questions, and recommended next steps' and specifies the output location 'context/handovers/'. These are concrete, well-defined capabilities.	3 / 3
Completeness	Clearly answers both 'what' (creates structured handover document with context, decisions, open questions, next steps) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when...' clause with multiple trigger scenarios and example phrases).	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Excellent coverage of natural trigger terms including 'hand off', 'transition', 'pass a task', 'handover notes', 'task transition document', 'capture current progress', plus explicit trigger phrases like 'create a handover', 'hand this off', 'write handover notes', 'pass this task on', 'document where I'm up to'.	3 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Occupies a clear niche around task handover/transition documentation with a specific output path. The trigger terms are distinct and unlikely to conflict with general documentation or note-taking skills due to the specificity of 'handover', 'hand off', and 'transition' terminology.	3 / 3
	Total	12 / 12 Passed

Implementation

85%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a well-structured, concise skill that clearly defines what to produce and how. The workflow is appropriately sequenced with a verification step, and the template with inline examples makes the expected output unambiguous. The only minor weakness is that actionability could be slightly improved with a concrete file-creation command or code snippet.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The content is lean and efficient. Every section serves a purpose — no explanation of what a handover is or why it matters. The template examples are brief and illustrative without being padded.	3 / 3
Actionability	The guidance is concrete with a clear template and examples for each section, but it's instruction-oriented rather than executable code. The naming convention `{plan_name}-{task_id}` is specific, but there's no concrete command or code snippet showing file creation, which slightly reduces actionability.	2 / 3
Workflow Clarity	The four-step workflow is clearly sequenced with an explicit verification step (step 4: confirm all four sections are populated). The fallback instruction for missing details (infer and label assumptions) provides a clear decision path. For a document-creation skill, this level of workflow clarity is appropriate.	3 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	For a skill under 50 lines with a single purpose, the content is well-organized into logical sections (what/how/template/output) without needing external references. The template is appropriately inline since it's the core deliverable.	3 / 3
	Total	11 / 12 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Reviewed

4 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation