Create structured handover notes for Shared Context Engineering tasks.
95
95%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is an excellent skill description that clearly articulates what the skill does (creates structured handover documents with specific content elements), where it saves output, and when it should be triggered. It includes a comprehensive set of natural trigger phrases and use cases, making it highly discoverable and unlikely to conflict with other skills.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: creates a structured handover document, summarizes task context, decisions made, open questions, and recommended next steps, and specifies the save location (`context/handovers/`). | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (creates a structured handover document summarizing context, decisions, open questions, next steps) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when...' clause with multiple trigger scenarios and example phrases). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Excellent coverage of natural trigger terms users would say: 'hand off', 'transition', 'pass a task', 'handover notes', 'task transition document', 'capture current progress', plus explicit trigger phrases like 'create a handover', 'hand this off', 'write handover notes', 'document where I'm up to'. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Occupies a clear niche around task handover/transition documentation with distinct triggers like 'handover', 'hand off', 'pass this task on'. The specific output location and document type make it unlikely to conflict with general documentation or note-taking skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-crafted skill that is concise, actionable, and clearly structured. It provides a concrete template with realistic examples, a clear workflow with a validation step, and appropriate organization for its scope. The only minor improvement would be noting edge cases (e.g., what if plan_name or task_id aren't available), but this is a minor concern given the fallback instruction about inferring from repo state.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient. Every section serves a purpose — no unnecessary explanations of what handover documents are or why they matter. The template and examples are concise and illustrative without being verbose. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete, copy-paste-ready markdown template with specific examples for each section. The file naming convention is explicit (`context/handovers/{plan_name}-{task_id}.md`), and the guidance about labelling assumptions is a useful, specific instruction. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The four-step workflow is clearly sequenced (gather → create → fill → verify). Step 4 includes an explicit validation checkpoint ('confirm all four sections are populated before finishing'). The fallback instruction for missing details adds a useful feedback mechanism. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | For a simple, single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no need for external references, the content is well-organized with clear sections (What I do, How to run, Template, Expected output). No bundle files are needed and none are referenced unnecessarily. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
Reviewed
Table of Contents