This is a well-structured, actionable skill that clearly guides Claude through reviewing an SCE plan and producing a readiness verdict. Its strengths are the concrete expected output format, explicit validation checkpoint (ready_for_implementation), and clear workflow sequencing. Minor weaknesses include some redundancy in the expected output section and inline content that could potentially be more concise.

Suggestions

Consolidate the readiness verdict explanation — the bullet points after the expected output examples repeat what the examples already demonstrate clearly, adding ~8 lines of redundancy.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The content is mostly efficient but has some redundancy — the 'Expected output' section repeats the readiness verdict concept multiple times (in the example, then again in bullet points below it). The 'Rules' section is tight. Some phrasing like 'Treat context/plans/ as active execution artifacts; completed plans are disposable and not a durable context source' could be tightened.	2 / 3
Actionability	The skill provides concrete, specific guidance: exact file paths to read, a clear plan file format example, a detailed expected output template with realistic examples of blockers and acceptance criteria, and explicit decision trees (e.g., missing context/ directory handling). This is copy-paste ready for Claude to follow.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	The multi-step process is clearly sequenced: read context files → resolve plan target → collect task status → identify blockers → prompt user for resolution → confirm scope → produce readiness summary. Validation is explicit via the ready_for_implementation verdict and the rule to block implementation until decisions are aligned. The feedback loop (issues found → required decisions → re-confirm) is well-defined.	3 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	The content is well-organized with clear sections (What I do, How to run this, Plan file format, Rules, Expected output, Related skills). However, for a skill of this length (~80 lines of content), some sections like the expected output examples are quite long inline. The reference to `sce-bootstrap-context` is clear but there are no bundle files to support deeper navigation. Adequate but not exemplary.	2 / 3
	Total	10 / 12 Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is an excellent skill description that clearly articulates specific capabilities (reviewing plan files, identifying next tasks, surfacing blockers, producing readiness verdicts), provides explicit trigger guidance with natural user phrases, and occupies a distinct niche. It uses proper third-person voice throughout and balances detail with conciseness.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists multiple specific concrete actions: reviews an existing plan file, identifies the next unchecked task, surfaces blockers or ambiguous acceptance criteria, and produces an explicit readiness verdict. These are all concrete, well-defined actions.	3 / 3
Completeness	Clearly answers both 'what' (reviews plan files, identifies next unchecked task, surfaces blockers, produces readiness verdict) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when...' clause with multiple trigger scenarios and example phrases).	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Includes excellent natural trigger terms that users would actually say: 'continue the plan', 'what's next?', 'resume work on the plan', 'review my plan and prepare the next task', 'pick the next step', 'check what remains'. These cover a wide range of natural phrasings.	3 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Highly distinctive — targets a specific niche of reviewing SCE plan files in a specific directory (`context/plans/`), with a specific workflow (plan review before implementation). The trigger terms are plan-continuation-specific and unlikely to conflict with general coding or document skills.	3 / 3
	Total	12 / 12 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Reviewed

17 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation