This is an excellent skill description that clearly articulates specific capabilities (identifying next tasks, surfacing blockers, producing readiness verdicts), provides explicit trigger guidance with natural user phrases, and occupies a distinct niche. It uses proper third-person voice throughout and balances detail with conciseness effectively.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists multiple specific concrete actions: reviews an existing plan file, identifies the next unchecked task, surfaces blockers or ambiguous acceptance criteria, and produces an explicit readiness verdict. These are all concrete, well-defined actions.	3 / 3
Completeness	Clearly answers both 'what' (reviews plan file, identifies next unchecked task, surfaces blockers, produces readiness verdict) and 'when' with an explicit 'Use when...' clause containing multiple trigger scenarios and example phrases.	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Excellent coverage of natural trigger terms users would say: 'continue the plan', 'what's next?', 'resume work on the plan', 'review my plan and prepare the next task', 'continue a plan', 'pick the next step', 'check what remains'. These are highly natural phrases.	3 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Highly distinctive — it targets a very specific niche (SCE plan files in context/plans/, Markdown checklists, pre-implementation review). The mention of specific file paths, plan continuation, and readiness verdicts makes it unlikely to conflict with other skills.	3 / 3
	Total	12 / 12 Passed

Implementation

77%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a well-crafted skill with strong actionability and workflow clarity. The expected output template with realistic examples is particularly effective, and the decision tree for edge cases (missing context/, multiple plans) is thorough. Minor improvements could be made in conciseness by reducing redundancy between the output example and the bullet-point summary that follows it.

Suggestions

Remove the bullet list after the expected output examples ('Explicit readiness verdict...', 'If not ready...', etc.) since these points are already clearly demonstrated in the example output above them.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The skill is mostly efficient but has some redundancy — the expected output section repeats concepts already stated in the rules (e.g., readiness verdict, blocker categories). The bullet list at the end of 'Expected output' restates what the example already shows. However, it avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows.	2 / 3
Actionability	The skill provides concrete, specific guidance: exact file paths to read, a clear plan file format example, a detailed output template with realistic content, and explicit decision trees (e.g., missing context/ directory handling). The expected output is copy-paste ready as a template.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	The multi-step process is clearly sequenced: read context files → resolve plan target → collect task status → identify blockers → prompt for resolution → confirm scope → produce readiness summary. Validation is explicit via the ready_for_implementation verdict and the rule to block implementation until decisions are aligned.	3 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	The content is well-structured with clear sections, but everything is inline in a single file. The expected output examples are lengthy and could potentially be referenced separately. However, for a skill of this size (~80 lines of content), inline is reasonable. The reference to `sce-bootstrap-context` is clear but minimal.	2 / 3
	Total	10 / 12 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Reviewed

about 2 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation