Execute one approved Shared Context Engineering plan task with guardrails.
100
100%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a strong skill description that excels across all dimensions. It clearly articulates specific capabilities (approval gates, scope guardrails, evidence capture), includes natural trigger terms users would say (implement, execute, task, feature), explicitly states both what it does and when to use it, and carves out a distinct niche around plan-based implementation with mandatory safeguards.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'coding a feature, applying a patch, or making targeted file changes' along with specific mechanisms like 'approval gate, scope guardrails, evidence capture, pre-implementation confirmation prompt, test/lint verification, and status tracking'. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('Executes a single planned implementation task with approval gate, scope guardrails, and evidence capture') AND when ('Use when a user wants to implement, run, or execute a specific task from a project plan') with explicit trigger guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes natural keywords users would say: 'implement', 'run', 'execute', 'task', 'project plan', 'coding a feature', 'applying a patch', 'file changes'. These are terms users naturally use when requesting implementation work. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive with specific niche: focuses on plan-based task execution with mandatory approval gates and scope enforcement, referencing specific file path 'context/plans/{plan_id}.md'. Unlikely to conflict with general coding or file manipulation skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-crafted skill that efficiently communicates a clear implementation workflow with mandatory approval gates. The content is concise yet complete, with excellent concrete examples for both the approval prompt and status tracking. The explicit validation checkpoints and scope guardrails demonstrate strong workflow design.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient, with no unnecessary explanations of concepts Claude already knows. Every section serves a clear purpose and the examples are appropriately sized to illustrate the patterns without padding. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste ready examples including the mandatory stop prompt template and task status update format. The required sequence is explicit with numbered steps and specific actions. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 8-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (step 3 approval gate, step 5 tests/lints/build, step 6 change classification). Includes scope expansion rule as a feedback loop for handling out-of-scope situations. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear sections (scope rule, mandatory stop, required sequence, scope expansion). For a skill of this size (~50 lines), the structure is appropriate with no need for external file references. Examples are inline but appropriately sized. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
Reviewed
Table of Contents