This is a strong, well-crafted description that clearly communicates what the skill does (execute planned implementation tasks with guardrails) and when to use it (when a user wants to implement a specific task from a project plan). It includes rich trigger terms, specific concrete actions, and distinctive elements like the approval gate and plan file tracking that differentiate it from generic coding or editing skills.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'coding a feature, applying a patch, making targeted file changes' along with specific mechanisms like 'approval gate, scope guardrails, evidence capture, pre-implementation confirmation prompt, test/lint verification, status tracking'.	3 / 3
Completeness	Clearly answers both 'what' (executes a planned implementation task with approval gate, scope guardrails, evidence capture) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when' clause specifying trigger scenarios like implementing a task from a project plan, coding a feature, applying a patch, etc.).	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Includes strong natural trigger terms users would say: 'implement', 'run', 'execute', 'task', 'project plan', 'coding a feature', 'applying a patch', 'file changes'. These cover common variations of how users would request task execution.	3 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Highly distinctive due to the specific combination of plan-based task execution with mandatory approval gates, scope guardrails, and status tracking in a specific file path (context/plans/{plan_id}.md). This is unlikely to conflict with general coding or file editing skills.	3 / 3
	Total	12 / 12 Passed

Implementation

85%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a well-structured implementation task skill with strong workflow clarity and actionability. The mandatory approval gate, concrete examples, and clear 8-step sequence make it highly usable. Minor conciseness improvements could be made by reducing redundancy between the prose description and the example of the mandatory stop prompt.

Suggestions

Consolidate the mandatory stop section by removing the bullet list explaining prompt contents and letting the example speak for itself, with just a one-line instruction like 'Before writing or modifying any code, present a stop prompt following this template:'

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The content is mostly efficient but has some redundancy — the mandatory stop section explains the prompt requirements in prose and then repeats them nearly verbatim in the example. The example itself earns its place, but the preceding bullet list could be tighter since the example already demonstrates the pattern.	2 / 3
Actionability	The skill provides a concrete, copy-paste-ready example of the mandatory stop prompt and a concrete example of the task status update format. The required sequence is specific with exact file paths and clear instructions for what to do at each step.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	The 8-step required sequence is clearly numbered with explicit validation checkpoints (step 3 is an approval gate, step 5 is test/lint/build verification, step 6 is a classification checkpoint). The scope expansion rule adds a feedback loop for out-of-scope situations. The mandatory stop before any code changes is a strong safety checkpoint.	3 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	For a skill of this size (~60 lines of meaningful content) with no need for external references, the content is well-organized into clearly labeled sections (Scope rule, Mandatory implementation stop, Required sequence, Scope expansion rule) with examples inline where they add value. No bundle files are needed.	3 / 3
	Total	11 / 12 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Reviewed

4 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation