crocoder-dev/sce-plan-review
Review Shared Context Engineering plans and identify the next ready task.
100
100%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is an excellent skill description that hits all the marks. It provides specific concrete actions, includes natural trigger phrases users would actually say, explicitly addresses both what and when, and carves out a clear niche that won't conflict with other skills. The description uses proper third-person voice throughout.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'identify the next unchecked task', 'surface blockers or ambiguous acceptance criteria', and 'produce an explicit readiness verdict'. Clear domain (SCE plan files in Markdown) and specific file location mentioned. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what (reviews plan files, identifies next task, surfaces blockers, produces readiness verdict) AND when (explicit 'Use when...' clause with multiple trigger scenarios and example phrases). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Excellent coverage of natural user phrases: 'continue the plan', 'what's next?', 'resume work on the plan', 'review my plan and prepare the next task'. These are exactly what users would naturally say when needing this skill. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive with specific niche: SCE plan files, Markdown checklists in 'context/plans/', readiness verdicts before implementation. The trigger phrases are specific to plan continuation/review, unlikely to conflict with general task or document skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-crafted skill that efficiently communicates a clear workflow for reviewing and preparing plan tasks. It excels at providing concrete examples (plan format, output templates) while maintaining brevity. The explicit readiness verdict pattern with issue categorization creates a strong validation checkpoint before implementation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient, avoiding unnecessary explanations. Every section serves a clear purpose and assumes Claude understands concepts like markdown checkboxes, JWT tokens, and file operations without explanation. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable guidance with specific file paths, exact markdown format examples, and detailed output templates. The plan file format and expected output sections are copy-paste ready references. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear multi-step workflow with explicit decision points: resolve plan target, collect task info, prompt for clarification, confirm scope. Includes validation checkpoint via the explicit readiness verdict (ready_for_implementation: yes|no) before proceeding. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear sections (What I do, How to run this, Plan file format, Rules, Expected output). References related skill appropriately. Content is appropriately sized for a single file without needing external references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
Reviewed
Table of Contents