CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

crocoder-dev/sce-task-execution

Execute one approved Shared Context Engineering plan task with guardrails.

75

Quality

94%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

Quality

Content

85%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a well-crafted skill that provides clear, actionable guidance for executing a single planned task with proper guardrails. Its strengths are the concrete examples (stop prompt and status update format) and the explicit 8-step workflow with validation checkpoints. The main weakness is mild redundancy between the mandatory stop section and the first three steps of the required sequence, which could be consolidated for better token efficiency.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The content is mostly efficient and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, but there's some redundancy between the 'Mandatory implementation stop' section and step 1-3 of the 'Required sequence' which restate the same information. The examples are valuable but the surrounding prose could be tighter.

2 / 3

Actionability

The skill provides concrete, specific guidance with a fully fleshed-out example of the mandatory stop prompt and a concrete example of the task status update format. The required sequence is explicit with specific file paths and tool actions (tests, lints, build). Claude knows exactly what to do at each step.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The 8-step required sequence is clearly ordered with an explicit approval gate (step 3) before any implementation, validation via tests/lints/build (step 5), and a scope expansion rule that acts as a feedback loop for out-of-scope changes. The mandatory stop before destructive operations (code changes) is well-defined with clear criteria.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

For a standalone skill with no bundle files, the content is well-organized into clearly labeled sections (Scope rule, Mandatory implementation stop, Required sequence, Scope expansion rule) with appropriate use of examples inline. The skill is under 80 lines and doesn't need external references; the structure is clean and navigable.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is an excellent skill description that clearly articulates what the skill does (executes planned implementation tasks with guardrails), when to use it (implementing/running/executing tasks from a project plan), and how it differs from general coding skills (mandatory approval gate, scope enforcement, evidence capture, status tracking). It uses third person voice consistently and provides concrete examples without being overly verbose.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'coding a feature, applying a patch, making targeted file changes' along with specific mechanisms like 'approval gate, scope guardrails, evidence capture, pre-implementation confirmation prompt, test/lint verification, status tracking'.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both what ('executes a single planned implementation task with approval gate, scope guardrails, and evidence capture') and when ('Use when a user wants to implement, run, or execute a specific task from a project plan') with explicit trigger guidance and concrete examples.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes strong natural trigger terms users would say: 'implement', 'run', 'execute', 'task', 'project plan', 'coding a feature', 'applying a patch', 'file changes'. These cover common variations of how users would request task execution.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Highly distinctive with its specific niche: executing tasks from a project plan with mandatory approval gates, scope boundaries, and status tracking in a specific file path (context/plans/{plan_id}.md). Unlikely to conflict with general coding or file editing skills due to the structured workflow emphasis.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Reviewed

Table of Contents