evilissimo/implementation-integrity-review
Reviews repositories, pull requests, diffs, and agent-generated code for reward hacking, fake completion, defensive theater, architectural bypasses, weakened guarantees, hidden fallbacks, and misleading abstractions.
98
97%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
100%
1.09xAverage score across 6 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
Evaluation results
100%
Test-Gaming Integrity Review
Identifies reward hacking
100%
100%
Critical severity
100%
100%
Evidence
100%
100%
Explains false confidence
100%
100%
Affected files
100%
100%
Remediation
100%
100%
Avoids benign framing
100%
100%
100%
Fake Provider Abstraction Integrity Review
Correct category
100%
100%
Severity
100%
100%
Single implementation evidence
100%
100%
Hardcoded success evidence
100%
100%
No injection
100%
100%
Test weakness
100%
100%
Remediation
100%
100%
Avoids abstraction absolutism
100%
100%
100%
45%Defensive Theater Integrity Review
Correct category
64%
100%
Severity
60%
100%
Broad exception evidence
100%
100%
Silent fallback evidence
25%
100%
Semantic mismatch
11%
100%
Test weakness
80%
100%
Remediation
57%
100%
No overreach
100%
100%
100%
Architecture Bypass Integrity Review
Correct category
100%
100%
Severity
100%
100%
Bypass evidence
100%
100%
Lost guarantees
100%
100%
Test weakness
100%
100%
Remediation
100%
100%
Evidence-backed
100%
100%
Legitimate Fallback Integrity Review
100%
Fake Completion Integrity Review
Leads with finding
100%
100%
Correct category
100%
100%
Severity
100%
100%
Evidence
100%
100%
Contract mismatch
100%
100%
Test weakness
100%
100%
Remediation
100%
100%
No lint noise
100%
100%
- Evaluated
- Agent
- Claude Code
- Model
- Claude Sonnet 4.6