Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is an excellent skill that provides a complete, actionable database health inspection workflow. It excels at conciseness by providing exact SQL queries and specific thresholds without explaining basic concepts. The four-phase structure with pre-conditions, cross-referencing between phases, HALT conditions, and a structured output report demonstrates strong workflow design.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every line serves a purpose — specific SQL queries, concrete thresholds, and clear flags. No unnecessary explanation of what Postgres is or how databases work. Assumes Claude's competence throughout. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable SQL queries ready to copy-paste via MCP execute_sql, with specific numeric thresholds (mean_exec_time > 100ms, seq_scan > 1000, n_dead_tup > 10000, 80% of max_connections) for decision-making. Nothing is left vague. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Four clearly sequenced phases with explicit pre-conditions, cross-referencing between phases (Phase 3 references Phase 2 findings), HALT conditions for missing extensions and CRITICAL findings, and a structured verification report with severity ratings serving as the validation checkpoint. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | For a skill of this scope (~50 lines, single diagnostic workflow), the content is well-organized into logical phases with clear section headers. No need for external file references given the focused nature of the task, and the structure supports easy scanning. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |