g14wxz/flutter-micro-ui
Atomic Design micro-UI architecture
90
90%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is an excellent skill description that clearly defines its scope (micro Flutter/Dart UI atoms and molecules), specifies the technical patterns used (StatelessWidget, HookConsumerWidget, mocktail, Riverpod), and provides an explicit 'Use when...' clause with rich, natural trigger terms. It is highly specific, complete, and distinctive, making it easy for Claude to select appropriately from a large skill set.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: generates micro Flutter/Dart UI components, uses StatelessWidget for atoms and HookConsumerWidget for molecules, includes form validation classes, and auto-generates widget tests with mocktail mocks. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (generates micro Flutter/Dart UI components with specific patterns, tests, and mocks) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when...' clause listing trigger scenarios like creating buttons, text fields, atoms, molecules, or Riverpod-integrated components). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Excellent coverage of natural terms users would say: 'Flutter', 'Dart', 'UI components', 'buttons', 'text fields', 'inputs', 'cards', 'reusable widgets', 'Atomic Design', 'atom', 'molecule', 'Riverpod'. These are terms a Flutter developer would naturally use. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive niche: specifically targets micro Flutter/Dart UI components following Atomic Design with Riverpod integration and mocktail testing. This is unlikely to conflict with general Flutter skills, testing skills, or broader UI component skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a strong, highly actionable skill with excellent workflow clarity and a thorough post-validation checklist. Its main weakness is moderate verbosity — some sections could be tightened without losing clarity — and the monolithic structure could benefit from splitting detailed templates into referenced files. The classification decision table, concrete constraints, and executable test template are particular strengths.
Suggestions
Tighten the Shared Constraints and molecule-specific requirements by removing items Claude would infer (e.g., 'NEVER relative imports' is already covered by the positive 'MUST use package:storestorm/... imports').
Consider extracting the test template and validator pattern into separate referenced files (e.g., MOLECULE_TEST_TEMPLATE.md) to improve progressive disclosure and reduce the main skill's token footprint.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is fairly well-structured and avoids explaining basic Flutter/Dart concepts, but it's verbose in places — the phase structure adds overhead, and some constraints (like 'MUST NOT contain business logic' with a parenthetical listing every possible violation) could be tighter. The repeated path template references and some redundant wiring instructions add bulk. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides concrete, executable guidance throughout: specific file paths, exact widget types, a complete test template with real Dart code, precise line count limits, specific import rules, and clear classification criteria with a decision table. The validator pattern and test structure are copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 6-phase workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit decision points (Phase 1 classification), conditional branching (atoms skip to Phase 6, validators only for molecules with inputs), and a comprehensive post-execution validation checklist in Phase 6 that acts as a feedback loop to catch and fix violations before completion. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is well-organized with clear phases and tables, but it's entirely monolithic — all content is inline in a single file. For a skill of this length (~150 lines of substantive content), the test template, validator pattern, and path conventions could be split into referenced files. However, the section headers and tables provide reasonable internal navigation. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
Reviewed
Table of Contents