Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a strong, well-structured skill that provides concrete, actionable guidance for debugging slow Postgres queries via EXPLAIN ANALYZE. The phased workflow with explicit thresholds, safety constraints, and a verification step makes it highly reliable. Minor verbosity in some explanatory sections prevents a perfect conciseness score, but overall token efficiency is good.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is mostly efficient and avoids explaining basic concepts Claude already knows (like what SQL is), but some sections could be tightened — e.g., the buffer usage ratio explanation and some of the deferral criteria are somewhat verbose. The JSON example node is useful but borderline on necessity. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable SQL examples (EXPLAIN ANALYZE syntax, CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY), specific JSON fields to inspect, concrete thresholds (10x ratio, 0.5 read ratio, 1000 rows), and exact naming conventions for indexes. Guidance is copy-paste ready and specific. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Seven clearly sequenced phases with explicit validation in Phase 7 (re-run EXPLAIN ANALYZE, compare before/after). Includes safety guardrails (never run on destructive statements, never CREATE INDEX without CONCURRENTLY), clear deferral points to another skill, and a before/after example demonstrating the feedback loop. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Appropriately references external skills (supabase-mcp-verification, db-diagnostics-inspection) with clear signaling of when to defer. Content is well-structured with phases as natural sections, and the skill itself stays focused on query plan analysis without inlining unrelated material. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |