Curated library of 28 atomic skills and 9 personas for Ruby on Rails development. Organized by category: testing, code-quality, engines, infrastructure, api, context, and personas. Covers code review, architecture, security, testing (RSpec), engines, Hotwire, and TDD automation. Shared Ruby skills (YARD docs, DDD, service objects) have moved to ruby-core-skills.
93
95%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
93%
1.16xAverage score across 28 eval scenarios
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Use this skill when the task is to change structure without changing intended behavior.
Core principle: Small, reversible steps over large rewrites. Separate design improvement from behavior change.
| Step | Action | Verification |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Define stable behavior | Written statement of what must not change |
| 2 | Add characterization tests | Tests pass on current code |
| 3 | Choose smallest safe slice | One boundary at a time |
| 4 | Rename, move, or extract | Tests still pass |
| 5 | Remove compatibility shims | Tests still pass, new path proven |
NO REFACTORING WITHOUT CHARACTERIZATION TESTS FIRST.
NEVER mix behavior changes with structural refactors in the same step —
if behavior changes are also needed, complete the structural refactor first,
then apply behavior changes in a separate step with its own test.
ONE boundary per refactoring step — never extract two abstractions in the same step.
If a public interface changes, document the compatibility shim and its removal condition.
NEVER fabricate test output — label only actual run output as Observed output.Identify the exact inputs and outputs of the logic being refactored. Keep public interfaces stable until callers are migrated. Prefer adapters, facades, or wrappers for transitional states.
Include in your output:
Write this before touching any production file. No refactoring step begins until this test exists and passes on the current (un-refactored) code. If the characterization spec fails, do not continue — stop and fix the test or the behavior mismatch.
# spec/requests/orders_spec.rb (or service/model spec — mirror the file being refactored)
# frozen_string_literal: true
RSpec.describe "Orders#create current behavior", type: :request do
describe "POST /orders" do
let(:valid_params) { { order: { product_id: 1, quantity: 2 } } }
it "creates order and enqueues warehouse notification" do
expect { post orders_path, params: valid_params }
.to change(Order, :count).by(1)
expect(NotifyWarehouseJob).to have_been_enqueued
end
end
endRun it: bundle exec rspec spec/requests/orders_spec.rb — it must pass on the current code.
Good first moves include: renaming unclear methods, isolating duplicated logic behind a shared object, or wrapping external integrations before moving call sites. Add narrow seams before deleting old code paths. One boundary at a time — characterization tests first, verification after each step.
Extract, move, or rename logic. Stop and simplify if the refactor introduces more indirection than clarity.
Before:
def create
order = OrderCreator.new(params).call
NotifyWarehouseJob.perform_later(order.id)
redirect_to order_path(order)
endAfter:
def create
order = Orders::CreateOrder.call(params: params)
redirect_to order_path(order)
endLoad these files only when their specific content is needed:
answer.md showing plan, stable behavior, characterization tests, step-by-step verification runs, and final suite verification command outputs.Run verification after every refactoring step:
Report test run output at EACH step — not only at the end. At least two separate Observed output entries at different sequence points are required.
Evidence labelling rules: Label actual run output as Observed output only. Never use labels such as "Expected output", "Required output", "Planned output", or "Must produce 0 failures" as substitutes for actual observed run output. If you have not run the tests, you have no observed output to report.
.tessl-plugin
evals
scenario-1
scenario-2
scenario-3
scenario-4
scenario-5
scenario-6
scenario-7
scenario-8
scenario-9
scenario-10
scenario-11
scenario-12
scenario-13
scenario-14
scenario-15
scenario-16
scenario-17
scenario-18
scenario-19
scenario-20
scenario-21
scenario-22
scenario-23
scenario-24
scenario-25
scenario-26
scenario-27
scenario-28
skills
api
generate-api-collection
implement-graphql
code-quality
apply-code-conventions
apply-stack-conventions
assets
snippets
code-review
refactor-code
review-architecture
security-check
context
load-context
setup-environment
engines
create-engine
create-engine-installer
document-engine
extract-engine
release-engine
review-engine
test-engine
upgrade-engine
infrastructure
implement-background-job
implement-hotwire
optimize-performance
review-migration
seed-database
version-api
personas
testing
plan-tests
test-service