CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

igmarin/ruby-core-skills

Curated library of 16 public Ruby AI agent skills covering TDD, refactoring, code review, security review, DDD, YARD documentation, and common design patterns.

94

1.13x
Quality

96%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

94%

1.13x

Average score across 16 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Advisory

Suggest reviewing before use

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

task.mdevals/scenario-11/

Review Process Task

Problem

A Ruby team needs help with a task in this area:

Reviews PRs using structured findings with severity levels (Critical/Major/Minor/Nitpick), verifies changeset includes tests for new/modified logic, reviews for correctness + safety + security + domain language adherence, checks for scope creep and authorization gaps (missing checks are Critical), presents structured table of findings by severity, generates self-review checklists for authors, produces findings reports, determines re-review criteria — and performs re-review verification by reviewing the diff against each finding.

The team has asked for a concise implementation artifact that a reviewer can inspect without needing to observe the agent's process.

Output

Create answer.md with:

  • a short plan for the work
  • the concrete Ruby-oriented artifact or recommendation
  • the verification steps or quality gates that should be run
  • any assumptions that affect the result

README.md

tile.json