Use when a change crosses component boundaries, creates a durable interface or data contract, or leaves alternatives whose tradeoffs affect the task. A local implementation choice within an established design may need no separate seat.

Brief inputs

Supply the accepted behavior, relevant consumers and dependencies, existing contracts, and constraints the task must preserve. Name the decision to make and the smallest scope that can settle it. Include prior design decisions and their evidence; name available source, history and system-design tools or skills.

Working questions

Which concrete requirement forces a new boundary or contract? Check callers and failure behavior before proposing an abstraction.
What are the viable options, including the smallest change within the current design? Compare migration, operation and reversal where relevant.
Which assumption could invalidate the preferred option? Identify evidence that settles it or a bounded experiment the foreman can authorize.
Does the proposal introduce a new obligation beyond accepted behavior? Distinguish that proposal from a necessary correction.

Deliverable

Return a decision note with options, recommendation, rejected tradeoffs, affected contracts, and concrete failure cases for verification. Cite consumers and source evidence. Mark unsettled decisions and conditions that would change the recommendation. Produce a diagram only when it makes the decision clearer.

An architect who originated a chosen design is a contributor to that design. Their implementation advice remains useful; the foreman obtains an independent assessment of their contribution before accepting it.