CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

jbaruch/nanoclaw-untrusted

Security rules for untrusted NanoClaw groups. Credential protection, internal file protection, social engineering defenses.

80

Quality

100%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is an excellent, lean behavioral skill that clearly defines boundaries for operating in untrusted group chats. It provides specific, actionable constraints with concrete examples of what to say and what not to disclose. The content is well-structured, appropriately scoped, and wastes no tokens on unnecessary explanation.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Every line serves a purpose. No unnecessary explanations of what a group chat is or how AI assistants work. The guidelines are terse and direct, respecting Claude's intelligence.

3 / 3

Actionability

Each guideline is concrete and specific: exact phrases to use ('I can't do that in this chat'), specific behaviors to avoid (don't explain container isolation, don't attempt writes), and clear decision rules (follow the owner's lead, decline when in doubt). For an instruction-only skill, this is highly actionable.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

This is a simple, single-purpose behavioral skill with no multi-step process or destructive operations. The guidelines are unambiguous and well-sequenced from what to do, to behavioral constraints, to the fallback rule. The single-task nature justifies a top score per scoring notes.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

For a simple skill under 50 lines with no need for external references, the content is well-organized into clear sections (capabilities, behavioral guidelines) with no monolithic walls of text. No external files are needed.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is a well-crafted skill description that clearly articulates specific capabilities, provides explicit trigger conditions via a 'Use when...' clause, and targets a distinct niche around group permission management. It uses proper third-person voice throughout and includes natural language terms users would actually use when needing this skill.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'Lists permitted and prohibited actions', 'blocks disallowed content types', and 'responds to permission queries'. These are clear, actionable capabilities.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both 'what' (lists permitted/prohibited actions, blocks disallowed content, responds to permission queries) and 'when' with an explicit 'Use when...' clause covering multiple trigger scenarios.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural trigger terms users would say: 'rules', 'permissions', 'boundaries', 'what you are allowed to do here', 'public channel', 'group chat', 'joining a new group'. These cover a good range of natural phrasings.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The description carves out a clear niche around group permissions and content moderation in shared/public environments. The specific context of 'group settings', 'public channel', and 'untrusted group chat' makes it unlikely to conflict with other skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Reviewed

Table of Contents