Security rules for untrusted NanoClaw groups. Credential protection, internal file protection, social engineering defenses.
100
100%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a strong skill description that clearly articulates specific capabilities (listing permissions, blocking content, answering permission queries) and provides explicit trigger conditions covering multiple relevant scenarios. The description uses proper third-person voice, includes natural language trigger terms, and occupies a distinct niche around group permission management.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'Lists permitted and prohibited actions', 'blocks disallowed content types', and 'responds to permission queries'. These are clear, actionable capabilities. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (lists permitted/prohibited actions, blocks disallowed content, responds to permission queries) and 'when' with an explicit 'Use when...' clause covering multiple trigger scenarios. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes natural keywords users would say: 'rules', 'permissions', 'boundaries', 'what you are allowed to do here', 'public channel', 'group chat', 'joining a new group'. Good coverage of natural trigger phrases. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Targets a clear niche around group permissions and content moderation in shared/public environments. The specific context of 'group settings', 'public channel', and 'untrusted group chat' makes it unlikely to conflict with other skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is an excellent, lean behavioral skill that clearly defines boundaries for operating in untrusted group chats. It's concise, actionable, and well-structured with specific do/don't guidance and concrete fallback phrases. The content respects Claude's intelligence while providing genuinely useful constraints that Claude wouldn't know by default.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every line earns its place. No unnecessary explanations of what a group chat is or how AI assistants work. The guidelines are tight and direct, assuming Claude's intelligence. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Each guideline provides specific, concrete behavioral instructions with clear examples of what to say ('I can't do that in this chat') and what not to do (don't explain container isolation, don't attempt writes). For a behavioral/instruction-only skill, this is fully actionable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a simple, single-purpose behavioral skill with no multi-step process. The single task—how to behave in untrusted groups—is unambiguous, with clear decision rules (follow owner's lead, when in doubt decline). Per scoring notes, simple skills can score 3 if the content is clear. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | For a skill under 50 lines with no need for external references, the content is well-organized into two clear sections (permissions and behavioral guidelines) with bold lead-ins for each rule. No external files are needed and none are artificially created. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
Reviewed
Table of Contents