CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

jbaruch/speaker-toolkit

Two-skill presentation system: analyze your speaking style into a rhetoric knowledge vault, then create new presentations that match your documented patterns. Includes an 88-entry Presentation Patterns taxonomy for scoring, brainstorming, and go-live preparation.

Overall
score

95%

Does it follow best practices?

Validation for skill structure

Overview
Skills
Evals
Files

narrative-arc.mdskills/presentation-creator/references/patterns/prepare/

id:
narrative-arc
name:
Narrative Arc
type:
pattern
part:
prepare
phase_relevance:
intent, architecture, content
vault_dimensions:
2, 5
detection_signals:
clear three-act structure, problem-solution arc, throughline maintained, rising tension toward resolution
related_patterns:
triad, bookends, intermezzi, unifying-visual-theme, context-keeper
inverse_of:
difficulty:
foundational

Narrative Arc

Summary

Structure your presentation as a story with beginning, middle, and end — leveraging humanity's innate feel for how stories work.

The Pattern in Detail

A narrative arc describes rising and falling tension through conflict and resolution. Humans are hardwired for stories — we have been telling them around campfires for millennia, and our brains are optimized to follow, remember, and retell narrative structures. A presentation that harnesses this innate wiring has a profound advantage over one that merely lists facts or demonstrates features.

The structure is deceptively simple: beginning, middle, and end. The beginning establishes context, introduces the problem or question, and gives the audience a reason to care. The middle escalates tension through complications, explores alternatives, and builds toward a climax. The end resolves the tension, delivers the payoff, and leaves the audience with a clear takeaway. This structure applies to every kind of presentation — not just storytelling talks. Even a product demo can follow a narrative arc: set up the differentiators that matter, show how competitors fall short (conflict), and finish with your product's strengths (resolution).

Discovering the narrative arc is often the hardest part of building a presentation. The raw material — your knowledge, your data, your experience — does not arrive pre-organized into a story. You must find the story within the material. One effective technique is to think in threes (the Triad pattern): three problems, three solutions, three insights. Another is to create flowchart-like views of your problem/solution structure, where each solution creates the conditions for the next problem. This chain of problem-solution-new-problem creates natural rising tension.

The narrative arc also provides a crucial coherence function. Every slide, every demo, every aside should serve the arc. If a piece of content does not advance the story, it either needs to be reframed so it does, or it needs to be cut. This is painful — speakers often love their tangential material — but ruthless adherence to the arc is what separates a memorable presentation from a forgettable one. The story creates shared context between speaker and audience, giving everyone a mental framework to organize new information as it arrives.

A common mistake is to have a strong beginning, a rich middle, and then run out of time for the ending. The resolution is not optional — it is the payoff for everything that came before. Plan your time so that the ending receives the attention it deserves. An unresolved narrative arc leaves the audience unsatisfied even if every individual slide was excellent.

When to Use / When to Avoid

Use this pattern for virtually every presentation. Even talks that seem purely informational benefit from narrative structure. Avoid forcing a dramatic arc onto material that genuinely does not have one — not every status update needs a villain — but even straightforward material benefits from a clear beginning-middle-end structure.

Detection Heuristics

The vault should look for evidence of intentional narrative structure. A clear throughline from problem to resolution, rising tension through the middle sections, and a satisfying conclusion are strong indicators. Random-seeming topic jumps and abrupt endings suggest the absence of a narrative arc.

Scoring Criteria

  • Strong signal (2 pts): Clear three-act structure; throughline maintained from opening to close; rising tension with satisfying resolution; every section serves the arc
  • Moderate signal (1 pt): Some narrative structure present but inconsistent; beginning and end exist but middle meanders; throughline partially maintained
  • Absent (0 pts): No discernible narrative structure; slides feel like a random collection; no resolution or payoff

Relationship to Vault Dimensions

Relates to Dimension 2 (Structure/Organization) as the primary structural pattern for presentations. Relates to Dimension 5 (Storytelling/Narrative) directly — this pattern IS the narrative dimension.

Combinatorics

Pairs powerfully with Triad (three-act structure maps to three main themes), Bookends (opening and closing that frame the arc), Intermezzi (transitions between arc sections), Unifying Visual Theme (visual coherence reinforces narrative coherence), and Context Keeper (maintaining audience orientation within the arc). The Narrative Arc is arguably the most foundational pattern — nearly every other pattern either supports it or depends on it.

Install with Tessl CLI

npx tessl i jbaruch/speaker-toolkit@0.5.1

skills

presentation-creator

references

patterns

_index.md

guardrails.md

process.md

slide-generation.md

SKILL.md

CHANGELOG.md

README.md

tile.json