CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

jbaruch/speaker-toolkit

Six-skill presentation system: ingest talks into a rhetoric vault, run interactive clarification, generate a speaker profile, create presentations that match your documented patterns, produce the deck illustrations + thumbnail visual layer, and publish talk pages to a Jekyll shownotes site. Includes a 102-entry Presentation Patterns taxonomy (91 observable, 11 unobservable go-live items) for scoring, brainstorming, and go-live preparation.

86

1.24x
Quality

92%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

86%

1.24x

Average score across 26 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Advisory

Suggest reviewing before use

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

Evaluation results

92%

25%

Presentation Analytics: Multi-Source Slide Ingestion

Criteria
Without context
With context

PPTX highest priority

100%

100%

Video-only talks are processable

83%

100%

No-video talks not processable

0%

90%

Multiple slide_source values used

100%

100%

Video extraction output named by YouTube ID

75%

75%

Slides fail + video available = fallback to video

80%

100%

Partial processing when one source fails

50%

100%

All fail = distinct failure status

0%

50%

Processing log explains decisions

90%

100%

100%

18%

Illustration Fix Triage and Quality Audit

Criteria
Without context
With context

Regenerate for content additions

10%

100%

Edit for content removal

90%

100%

Simplified anchor flagged

100%

100%

Safety suffix: no new elements

87%

100%

Safety suffix: background continuation

100%

100%

Explicit preservation instructions

90%

100%

Versioned output naming

100%

100%

Fix mode for near-perfect images

87%

100%

PIL masking flagged as wrong approach

100%

100%

Missing preservation flagged

100%

100%

Content modification via edit flagged

37%

100%

100%

44%

Conference Talk Rhetoric Analysis

Criteria
Without context
With context

Opening pattern analyzed

100%

100%

Narrative structure analyzed

100%

100%

Humor documented

100%

100%

Audience interaction noted

100%

100%

Areas for improvement

12%

100%

Structured data fields

20%

100%

Opening type categorized correctly

100%

100%

Closing type categorized correctly

75%

100%

Verbatim signature phrases

37%

100%

Verbatim opening lines

37%

100%

Verbatim closing lines

37%

100%

Transition phrases extracted

62%

100%

JSON schema completeness

10%

100%

100%

44%

Generate a Speaker Profile from a Completed Vault

Criteria
Without context
With context

Required top-level keys

20%

100%

Speaker fields from config

100%

100%

Speaker badges present

100%

100%

Speaker badges grounded in vault stats

100%

100%

Signature patterns with usage counts

58%

100%

never_used_patterns listed

0%

100%

guardrail_sources.slide_budgets is array

0%

100%

instrument_catalog populated

0%

100%

confirmed_intents carried over

100%

100%

pacing data populated

100%

100%

antipattern_frequency present

28%

100%

96%

39%

Rhetoric Vault: Process a Conference Talk

Criteria
Without context
With context

Analysis file location

100%

100%

All 14 dimensions present

73%

100%

English-only quote format

40%

100%

Language-tagged verbal signatures

37%

100%

Structured data fields

37%

100%

Pattern score formula

0%

100%

Observable patterns only

100%

50%

Verbatim examples

66%

100%

Tracking DB updated

40%

100%

Areas for improvement present

100%

100%

Presentation Patterns Scoring section

62%

100%

95%

3%

Conference CFP Submission

Criteria
Without context
With context

Abstract word count

100%

100%

Takeaway count

100%

100%

Speaker bio included

100%

100%

Title present

100%

100%

Presentation spec produced

100%

100%

Spec includes mode

100%

100%

No full architecture

100%

60%

Speaker voice in abstract

100%

100%

Spec includes duration

0%

100%

Spec includes profanity register

66%

100%

Spec includes commercial intent

100%

100%

Spec includes shownotes slug

100%

83%

Anti-sell awareness

100%

100%

98%

7%

Humor Post-Mortem and Blind Spot Debrief

Criteria
Without context
With context

Per-joke grading

40%

100%

Joke questions grounded in observations

100%

100%

Meme slide questions

75%

100%

Spontaneous humor capture

100%

100%

Promotion prompt

87%

100%

Blind spot questions

100%

100%

Demo reaction questions

100%

100%

Recency adaptation — recent

100%

100%

Recency adaptation — old

100%

91%

Structured output format

100%

91%

71%

16%

Illustrated Outline Quality Audit

Criteria
Without context
With context

Both checker scripts referenced

0%

13%

Data attribution FAIL surfaced

91%

91%

Closing FAIL surfaced

75%

91%

Cut-lines FAIL surfaced

60%

90%

Rushed-closing recurring issue noted

50%

87%

Vague image prompt flagged (slide 5)

100%

90%

Schema validation confirmed up front

0%

0%

Big-idea singleton confirmed

40%

100%

Thesis preview/payoff ordering confirmed

80%

100%

Illustration coverage commentary

85%

85%

Report distinguishes FAIL vs FLAG vs INFO

37%

75%

100%

79%

Illustrated Conference Talk Outline

Criteria
Without context
With context

outline.yaml validates against schema

14%

100%

style_anchor block present

0%

100%

Format-specific anchors

0%

100%

Visual continuity conventions documented

37%

100%

format field on every slide

0%

100%

EXCEPTION slides carry format_justification

50%

100%

image_prompt uses [STYLE ANCHOR] token

0%

100%

visual field present alongside image_prompt

0%

100%

Prompt richer than visual description

0%

100%

Visual continuity: FIG numbering

66%

100%

Visual continuity: progressive form

83%

100%

Standard outline structure preserved

50%

100%

74%

-5%

Route a Single Request to the Right Illustrations Mode

Criteria
Without context
With context

Request A routes to Strategy mode

86%

73%

Request B routes to Generation mode

85%

80%

Request C routes to Thumbnail mode

86%

80%

Step references resolve against the skill's canonical sequence

33%

33%

Request B includes builds because outline has Builds blocks

90%

100%

Request B includes apply-to-deck because .pptx exists

90%

80%

Request A finishes after Step 2

80%

70%

No mode confusion across requests

100%

100%

100%

44%

Pattern Strategy for a Conference Talk

Criteria
Without context
With context

4-tier structure present

25%

100%

Signature tier from profile

100%

100%

Contextual tier from profile

100%

100%

Shake It Up has 1-2 items

0%

100%

[RECURRING] tag used

46%

100%

[CONTEXTUAL] tag used

46%

100%

New to You from never_used

100%

100%

Actionable recommendations

100%

100%

90%

-2%

Slide Deck Visual Audit Report

Criteria
Without context
With context

Skips static files

100%

100%

Skips conflict copies

100%

100%

Skips template files

100%

100%

Background colors extracted

80%

80%

Per-slide breakdown present

90%

70%

Global design statistics

100%

100%

Shape type detail

100%

100%

Font extraction

37%

50%

Footer detection

100%

90%

Recursive directory scan

100%

100%

Valid JSON output

100%

100%

91%

72%

Adding Progressive Reveals to an Illustrated Talk

Criteria
Without context
With context

Build specification format

0%

70%

Build step 0 is empty frame

0%

90%

Final build matches the full slide

70%

60%

Backwards-chaining workflow described

10%

100%

Build naming convention

0%

100%

Build slides count toward budget

50%

87%

Speaker notes on final step only

0%

100%

BLANK layout for all builds

0%

100%

Explicit preservation instructions

20%

100%

Safety suffixes mentioned

0%

100%

Parent slide replaced by build sequence

50%

100%

59%

4%

Talk Library Organizer

Criteria
Without context
With context

Top-level DB structure

70%

50%

Config captures source directories

100%

100%

Talk fields extracted

100%

100%

URL fields parsed

50%

40%

New talks default to pending

0%

12%

No-sources talk flagged as unprocessable

53%

80%

Slide source determination

30%

20%

Static files skipped

0%

37%

Conflict copies skipped

50%

37%

Template files skipped

62%

87%

PPTX-to-talk matching

100%

80%

Scan report with counts

100%

100%

100%

25%

Pick the Right Thumbnail Aesthetic from Vault Signals

Criteria
Without context
With context

Recommended aesthetic is comic_book

100%

100%

Decision cites the precedence step that produced the answer

33%

100%

Decision quotes the matched field value

50%

100%

No side-by-side comparison forced

100%

100%

Speaker photo path from profile

100%

100%

style_preference and title_position applied

100%

100%

Brand colors applied

100%

100%

Step 1 not silently skipped

0%

100%

Title argument is the speaker-confirmed hook verbatim

100%

100%

100%

17%

Plan Thumbnail Revision After Speaker Feedback

Criteria
Without context
With context

Iterate not restart strategy

66%

100%

Style changed to split_panel

100%

100%

Title position changed to top

100%

100%

Title text unchanged

100%

100%

Slide image unchanged

100%

100%

Face issue addressed via style variant, not preservation language

20%

100%

generate-thumbnail.py used

100%

100%

Slide image from illustrations directory

100%

100%

Original vs revised comparison

100%

100%

Speaker photo path unchanged

100%

100%

97%

50%

Video Slide Extraction Quality Diagnostics

Criteria
Without context
With context

Wide-angle detection

8%

100%

Hash threshold recommendation

0%

80%

Slide region crop suggestion

12%

100%

Multi-language transcript handling

40%

90%

Whisper hallucination detection

90%

100%

Transcript source tracking

100%

100%

Speaker identity verification

90%

100%

Recording type classification

40%

100%

Structured diagnostics output

90%

100%

Clean recording passes cleanly

16%

100%

88%

Publish a Pre-Talk Shownotes Page (No Delivery Date Yet)

Criteria
Without context
With context

Filename uses the date-less convention

100%

100%

Date field is omitted from the body

100%

100%

Body H1 and field block remain intact

100%

100%

Video field is also omitted

100%

100%

Presentation-context paragraph omits the date sub-phrase

0%

0%

Frontmatter is minimal — no title, no date, no thumbnail_url

100%

100%

Abstract is a single paragraph from talk.thesis

100%

100%

Resources lists only the approved entry

100%

100%

No TODO markers and no placeholder URL syntax

100%

100%

90%

-10%

Publish a Talk Page When the Recording Isn't Ready

Criteria
Without context
With context

No **Video:** line of any kind

100%

100%

No frontmatter compensation for the missing video

100%

100%

No body-text 'Coming soon' compensation

100%

100%

Slides line is present with a real URL

100%

100%

Filename uses the dated convention with the spec slug

100%

0%

Conference and Date field lines are present

100%

100%

Abstract is one flowing paragraph from talk.thesis

100%

100%

Body H1 matches talk.title

100%

100%

Resources lists both approved entries

100%

100%

No HTML comments or TODO markers

100%

100%

100%

Add the Video URL to an Existing Shownotes Page

Criteria
Without context
With context

Video line added in markdown-link form

100%

100%

Video line placed in the field block, not below the abstract

100%

100%

Filename is unchanged

100%

100%

All five Resources entries preserved verbatim

100%

100%

Abstract preserved verbatim, not regenerated

100%

100%

Presentation-context paragraph preserved

100%

100%

Frontmatter is unchanged and stays minimal

100%

100%

No TODO markers or `(#)` placeholder links anywhere

100%

100%

No spurious deletions

100%

100%

87%

-12%

Publish a Delivered Talk to the Shownotes Site

Criteria
Without context
With context

Filename uses the dated convention

100%

0%

Body H1 matches talk.title

100%

100%

Frontmatter is minimal

100%

100%

Field block uses bold-label lines in markdown-link form

100%

100%

Video field is omitted entirely

100%

100%

Presentation-context paragraph anchors with 'A presentation at'

90%

90%

Abstract is a single flowing paragraph

100%

100%

Resources lists only approved entries

100%

100%

Section order is Abstract then Resources

100%

100%

No TODO markers or HTML comments left in the file

100%

100%

45%

35%

Generate Deck Illustrations for an Aged Outline

Criteria
Without context
With context

Freshness gate precedes generation

0%

43%

Baked model recognized as absent from current roster

45%

72%

Explicit decision point before generation

0%

0%

No silent generation with stale model

0%

83%

0%

-42%

Choose an Image Model for a Build-Heavy Deck on a Budget

Criteria
Without context
With context

Model choice is priority-driven

80%

0%

Builds recognized as an edit-support requirement

24%

0%

Shortlist narrowed by data before rendering

40%

0%

Shortlist excludes the non-editing model and favors low cost

25%

0%

Confirms the choice visually, not from prose

46%

0%

94%

21%

Generate Deck Illustrations Right After Picking a Model

Criteria
Without context
With context

Freshness gate precedes generation

15%

81%

No spurious model-change proposal

100%

100%

Proceeds to generation without re-litigating

100%

100%

Generation uses the outline's declared model

100%

100%

95%

-5%

QR Generation with Bitly Custom Back-Half and Slug from outline.yaml

Criteria
Without context
With context

Talk slug read from outline.yaml

100%

100%

Shownotes URL constructed from pattern + outline.yaml slug

100%

100%

Bitly custom back-half is the talk slug

100%

100%

QR encodes bitly URL, not raw shownotes URL

100%

100%

generate-qr.py used, not qrcode library directly

100%

100%

Command uses --shownotes-url (not --short-url)

100%

100%

Tracking DB update mentioned

100%

100%

No silent degradation to raw URL

100%

50%

96%

-4%

QR Generation for a Closing Slide

Criteria
Without context
With context

Agent surfaces missing shortener config

100%

100%

Agent asks user to choose a shortener

100%

73%

Agent does NOT generate QR with raw URL without asking

100%

100%

Shownotes URL uses slug from outline.yaml (talk.slug)

100%

100%

Talk slug matches spec exactly

100%

100%

Agent references generate-qr.py as the tool

100%

100%

Agent distinguishes missing config from opt-out

100%

100%

Evaluated
Agent
Claude Code
Model
Claude Sonnet 4.6

Table of Contents