jbvc/prisma-expert
Prisma ORM expert for schema design, migrations, query optimization, relations modeling, and database operations. Use PROACTIVELY for Prisma schema issues, migration problems, query performance, relation design, or database connection issues.
82
82%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
92%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a strong skill description that clearly identifies the domain (Prisma ORM), lists specific capabilities, and includes an explicit 'Use PROACTIVELY for...' clause with trigger scenarios. The main weakness is slight overlap potential with general database or other ORM skills due to some generic database terminology, though the Prisma specificity mitigates this considerably.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: schema design, migrations, query optimization, relations modeling, and database operations. These are distinct, well-defined capabilities within the Prisma domain. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (schema design, migrations, query optimization, relations modeling, database operations) and 'when' with an explicit 'Use PROACTIVELY for...' clause listing specific trigger scenarios. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes strong natural keywords users would say: 'Prisma', 'schema', 'migrations', 'query performance', 'relation design', 'database connection issues'. These cover the main terms a developer would use when encountering Prisma-related problems. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | While 'Prisma' is a clear niche, terms like 'database operations', 'query optimization', and 'database connection issues' could overlap with general database skills or other ORM-specific skills. The Prisma branding helps but doesn't fully eliminate conflict risk with broader database tools. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
64%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a solid, actionable Prisma skill with excellent executable code examples covering schema design, migrations, queries, connections, and transactions. Its main weaknesses are moderate verbosity (could be tightened by ~20-30%), a monolithic structure that would benefit from splitting into companion files, and workflow steps that lack explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops for error recovery in destructive operations like migrations.
Suggestions
Split detailed playbooks (Schema Design, Migrations, Query Optimization, etc.) into separate companion files and reference them from a concise SKILL.md overview to improve progressive disclosure.
Add explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops to the migration workflow—e.g., 'Run migrate status after deploy to confirm success; if failed, run resolve --rolled-back and investigate before retrying.'
Remove the introductory sentence ('You are an expert in Prisma ORM...') and trim explanatory text that describes what problems are rather than how to fix them, to improve conciseness.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is fairly comprehensive but includes some unnecessary verbosity—comments like 'You are an expert in Prisma ORM with deep knowledge of...' and resource links that pad length. The BAD/GOOD/BETTER/BEST progression in query optimization is useful but slightly verbose. Some sections like Connection Management explain concepts Claude would already know (e.g., what connection pool exhaustion is). | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides fully executable code examples throughout—bash commands for diagnosis, complete Prisma schema examples, TypeScript query patterns, environment variable configurations, and CLI commands. All examples are copy-paste ready and cover real-world scenarios. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The skill has a general 4-step strategy (identify, check, apply progressive fixes, validate) and each playbook has a Minimal→Better→Complete progression, which is good. However, the migration workflow lacks explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops for error recovery beyond listing commands. The overall 'Apply Strategy' section is too vague to serve as a real workflow. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is well-organized with clear section headers and playbook structure, but it's a monolithic document (~200+ lines) that could benefit from splitting detailed playbooks into separate files. Resource links are provided but point to external docs rather than local companion files. The code review checklist and anti-patterns could be separate reference files. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
Reviewed
Table of Contents