Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured overview with executable commands, a genuine verify-fix-reverify feedback loop, and properly signaled one-level-deep references. It falls just short of top marks on conciseness (some redundant cautionary restatements), actionability (SMT request example deferred entirely to a reference file), and workflow clarity (sequence expressed in prose rather than explicit checkpoints).
Suggestions
Consolidate the three overlapping don't-over-claim sentences in 'Read the evidence' into a single freshness/verdict checklist to cut redundant tokens.
Inline a minimal query.json example next to 'sail runtime execute --file query.json' so the primary SMT workflow is fully executable without opening references/smt.md.
Render the verify-revise-reverify loop as a short numbered sequence with the scope/currentness check as an explicit validation step before reporting success.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Overall lean with executable commands and no beginner-concept padding, but the 'Read the evidence' section restates the don't-over-claim caution three ways (e.g. 'Current describes freshness, not success', 'solver installation readiness alone is not a result about the formula') — minor trimming would fit anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Mostly executable with copy-paste commands ('sail verify --output json', 'sail new --lib demo', 'sail runtime execute --file query.json'), but the SMT request payload structure is not shown inline — it is deferred to references/smt.md — leaving a minor gap versus anchor 5's fully covered common cases. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The verify-revise-reverify feedback loop and the scope/currentness validation checkpoint are both present ('Use the failure locations and diagnostics to revise the code or proof, then verify again'), but the sequence is prose rather than explicit numbered steps or a checklist, so it sits below anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A concise ~60-line overview whose two references (references/verus.md, references/smt.md, both present in the bundle) are one level deep and well signaled with content descriptions ('for standalone files, MCP, background preparation, explicit jobs, proof-repair checks and cache management') — matching the anchor-5 pattern. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |