Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, highly actionable skill with excellent workflow and validation guidance; its only real defect is that the single progressive-disclosure reference (rules/) points to a bundle directory that is not present.
Suggestions
Provide the missing rules/ directory referenced by 'Read rules/<rule-name>.md for details', or remove the dangling reference so navigation does not dead-end.
Confirm the auto-generated schema/metrics blocks degrade gracefully when the Kopai backend is offline, since their output becomes the reader's primary reference material.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient throughout — it assumes Claude's TS/SDK competence, omits concept explanations, and every section (rules, caveats, workflow, example) earns its tokens rather than padding. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready code (the complete create-cpu-dashboard.mts), concrete kq query chains, and exact CLI commands — well above the pseudocode anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step numbered workflow with an explicit validation/feedback loop in step 4 ('On a KopaiValidationError/KopaiError, re-run discoverMetrics()... fix the tree, and retry'), plus a preventive 'Two rules' checkpoint section. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The in-body organization is clean and the only reference is one level deep and clearly signaled, but it points to 'rules/<rule-name>.md' and the rules/ bundle directory does not exist — a dangling reference that the guideline says to penalize against the actual bundle structure. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |