CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

maj-labs/app-store-review

Full-lifecycle Apple App Store review for iOS and iPadOS apps. Use for pre-submission audits, rejection diagnosis and Resolution Center replies, Guideline 4.3 spam or similarity recovery, human-craft and low-effort audits, App Review Notes, privacy manifests, Info.plist permission strings, subscriptions, Sign in with Apple, account deletion, UGC, third-party AI consent, TestFlight or App Store readiness, and vague requests such as "review my app" or "will Apple approve this" when an Xcode, Expo, React Native, or Flutter project is present. Produces evidence-tagged Markdown, JSON, and a self-contained visual HTML report, runs a read-only deterministic scan first, and only offers grouped fixes after the report.

95

1.67x
Quality

94%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

99%

1.67x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

Evaluation results

98%

30%

Help Petra Respond to the Nimbus Weather Rejection

4.3(b) rejection recovery for weather app

Criteria
Baseline
With context

4.3(b) vs 4.3(a) distinction

20%

100%

Response classification

50%

100%

Exact rejection message preserved

62%

100%

Resolution Center reply present

100%

100%

Build number placeholder or reference

100%

100%

Attachments listed

100%

100%

No code obfuscation recommendation

100%

100%

No unsupported provenance claim

75%

75%

Fast review timeline not mischaracterized

87%

100%

Evidence confidence labels

0%

100%

No invented evidence

37%

100%

No AI-detection claim

100%

100%

100%

55%

Is ShareFlow Ready to Submit?

Expo app full pre-launch review with extension targets

Criteria
Baseline
With context

Mode A declared first

0%

100%

Mode C declared

0%

100%

Expo config cited as evidence

87%

100%

Fix targets app.json or plugin

87%

100%

Share extension reviewed separately

87%

100%

MANUAL CHECK for absent ios/ directory

25%

100%

Missing camera purpose string identified

0%

100%

Policy verification date recorded

57%

100%

ITMS-91053 absent

100%

100%

Five Mode C interventions

0%

100%

All five Mode C dimensions graded

0%

100%

No files modified

100%

100%

Fix plan section present

44%

100%

100%

34%

Prepare the App Store Review Handoff

HTML report generation from reviewed audit JSON

Criteria
Baseline
With context

Script invocation

0%

100%

No remote assets

100%

100%

System typography

100%

100%

Amber accent only

30%

100%

No forbidden design patterns

0%

100%

JSON-only findings

100%

100%

All three paths reported

100%

100%

Verification documented

30%

100%

Verdict in summary

100%

100%

No Markdown in JSON

100%

100%

Evaluated
Agent
Claude Code
Model
Claude Sonnet 4.6

Table of Contents