markusdowne/memory-roundtrip-guard
Tests memory writes, confirms read-back accuracy, and validates retrieval success to ensure saved information can actually be recovered. Use when you need to verify memory was saved correctly, check if stored data can be retrieved, confirm a memory entry is discoverable, or escalate when saved information appears lost or corrupted. Covers write confirmation, read-back comparison, retrieval smoke testing, and failure escalation. Includes explicit untrusted-content/prompt-injection guardrails for third-party inputs.
92
90%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
97%
1.19xAverage score across 5 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
Evaluation results
100%
Build a Memory Round-Trip Verification Procedure
memory write-read-retrieve verification
Roundtrip steps
100%
100%
Metadata requirements
100%
100%
Failure escalation
100%
100%
Checksum validation
100%
100%
100%
38%User Preference Persistence Verification
Memory write verification with metadata
Timestamp in metadata
62%
100%
Source in metadata
0%
100%
Confidence in metadata
0%
100%
Content field present
33%
100%
Write success check
100%
100%
Read-back performed
100%
100%
Metadata presence validated
10%
100%
Content non-empty validated
50%
100%
Write status in output
100%
100%
Read-back status in output
100%
100%
Classification in output
71%
100%
Remediation action in output
100%
100%
96%
22%Configuration Migration with Integrity Assurance
Checksum integrity validation on write
Checksum computed pre-write
100%
100%
Checksum stored in metadata
58%
100%
Read-back performed
100%
100%
Checksum verified post-read
100%
100%
Mismatch raises error
50%
66%
Required metadata present check
0%
100%
Content non-empty check
37%
100%
Classification assigned
80%
100%
Write status reported
100%
100%
Read-back status reported
100%
100%
93%
19%Knowledge Base Search Verification
Retrieval smoke test and discoverability
Read-back before smoke test
0%
100%
Retrieval query performed
100%
100%
Discoverability asserted
100%
100%
Retrieval status reported
100%
100%
Retrieval miss classified
66%
100%
Repeated failure escalated
53%
53%
Classification in output
50%
100%
Remediation action present
100%
100%
100%
3%Memory Reliability Audit Tool
Failure classification and escalation reporting
Clean classification
100%
100%
Operational classification
100%
100%
Critical classification
100%
100%
Repeated failure not suppressed
100%
100%
Daily digest section
100%
100%
Unresolved failures in digest
100%
100%
Remediation/escalation per entry
100%
100%
Write status reported
40%
100%
Read-back status reported
100%
100%
Retrieval status reported
100%
100%
- Evaluated
- Agent
- Claude Code
- Model
- Claude Sonnet 4.6