CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

matthew-a-carr/review-spec

Cross-artefact consistency and quality review of an approved or draft SPEC. Use when the user says "review SPEC-NNN," before `implement-spec` runs, or by `draft-spec` / `revise-spec` before opening or updating a spec PR. Checks the SPEC against the constitution, ADRs, parent epic (if any), and tech debt register. Read-only — produces a structured report, never edits files.

78

1.42x
Quality

90%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

80%

1.42x

Average score across 1 eval scenario

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

Evaluation results

80%

24%

Review a User Role Management Specification

Clean SPEC ready verdict and read-only behavior

Criteria
Without context
With context

Verdict: Ready for implementation

0%

0%

All four report sections present

41%

100%

Clean passes explicitly noted

20%

100%

ADRs verified correctly

60%

100%

Result type pattern confirmed

0%

37%

Tech debt TD-010 linkage Suggestion

75%

100%

No inputs modified

100%

100%

Does not invoke implement-spec

100%

100%

Section-prefixed findings or notes

100%

100%

SPEC quoted where relevant

100%

100%

Evaluated
Agent
Claude Code
Model
Claude Sonnet 4.6

Table of Contents