Spec Revision: Search Integration PR

Problem Description

A spec pull request for a full-text search integration (PR #17) has come back with review comments from multiple reviewers. The PR is on branch claude/spec-017-search. The comments include a direct contradiction between two reviewers on a performance target, a concrete architectural recommendation from the primary stakeholder, and a request that may conflict with the spec's stated non-goals.

Your job is to produce a revised spec and supporting revision documents that correctly handle all the feedback — including the conflict — according to the project's revision principles.

The input files are provided under inputs/:

• inputs/SPEC-017-search.md — the current spec file
• inputs/review_comments.json — the review comments (structured data representing what would be fetched from GitHub), with timestamps and authorship

Output Specification

Produce the following files in your working directory:

1. SPEC-017-search-revised.md — the updated spec with all appropriate changes applied
2. revision_plan.md — for each comment: the comment ID, classification, action taken, and reasoning
3. pr_comment_summary.md — the full text of the top-level PR comment that would be posted, in the format used by the revise-spec workflow
4. per_comment_replies.md — the reply text for each individual comment
5. commit_message.txt — the exact commit message that would be used when pushing this revision

Work only from the files in inputs/. Treat the review_comments.json as the authoritative source of all feedback.