CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

mcclowes/docusaurus-plugins

Use when creating Docusaurus plugins — write remark transformers for markdown AST, rehype transformers for HTML/HAST, lifecycle plugins that add routes/webpack config/global data via loadContent and contentLoaded, theme plugins and swizzled components, and content plugins for custom data sources. Triggers on tasks involving custom remark/rehype plugins, content plugins, theme plugins, or Docusaurus lifecycle hooks.

71

Quality

89%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

Quality

Content

72%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a well-structured skill that excels at progressive disclosure and conciseness, serving as an effective routing document to detailed reference files. Its main weaknesses are limited actionability beyond the single remark plugin example and the absence of a development/testing workflow with validation checkpoints. Adding a brief workflow and one more executable example would significantly strengthen it.

Suggestions

Add a brief end-to-end workflow: create plugin file → implement → register in docusaurus.config.js → run `npm start` to verify → check browser console for errors

Include at least one more executable code example for a different plugin type (e.g., a minimal lifecycle plugin skeleton) to improve actionability across the five types

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The content is lean and efficient. It doesn't explain what Docusaurus is, what plugins are conceptually, or other things Claude already knows. The decision table is a compact way to convey plugin type selection. Every section earns its place.

3 / 3

Actionability

The quick start provides a concrete, executable remark plugin example with config integration, which is good. However, only one plugin type gets a code example — the other four types (rehype, lifecycle, theme, content) have no concrete code, relying entirely on references. The skill body itself is incomplete for someone needing to act on non-remark tasks.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The decision table provides a clear routing mechanism for choosing a plugin type, which is helpful. However, there's no workflow for actually developing a plugin end-to-end (e.g., create file → write plugin → register in config → test → debug). No validation or verification steps are mentioned for any plugin type.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Excellent structure: concise overview with a decision table routing to one-level-deep reference files. Six reference files are clearly listed and linked with descriptive labels. The content appropriately keeps the SKILL.md as a navigational hub without inlining detailed content.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is an excellent skill description that clearly defines the scope (Docusaurus plugin development), lists specific concrete capabilities (remark transformers, rehype transformers, lifecycle plugins, theme plugins, content plugins), and provides explicit trigger guidance. The description uses appropriate third-person voice and includes domain-specific terminology that would naturally match user requests in this area.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions: writing remark transformers for markdown AST, rehype transformers for HTML/HAST, lifecycle plugins with routes/webpack config/global data, theme plugins, swizzled components, and content plugins for custom data sources.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both 'what' (write remark/rehype transformers, lifecycle plugins, theme plugins, content plugins) and 'when' ('Use when creating Docusaurus plugins' and 'Triggers on tasks involving custom remark/rehype plugins, content plugins, theme plugins, or Docusaurus lifecycle hooks').

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes strong natural keywords users would say: 'Docusaurus plugins', 'remark', 'rehype', 'markdown AST', 'HAST', 'webpack config', 'swizzled components', 'content plugins', 'lifecycle hooks', 'theme plugins'. These are terms a developer working with Docusaurus would naturally use.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Highly distinctive — the Docusaurus ecosystem with its specific plugin types (remark, rehype, lifecycle, swizzled components) creates a clear niche that is unlikely to conflict with other skills. The terminology is domain-specific enough to avoid false triggers.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Reviewed

Table of Contents