Extract actionable insights and valuable artifacts from web posts, articles, and technical documentation. Use when summarizing content, extracting key ideas from URLs/articles, preserving code snippets and diagrams, or creating visual summaries. Triggers on requests like "summarize this post", "extract insights from", "distill this article", "what are the key takeaways", or when a URL is shared for analysis.
96
100%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
90%
1.21xAverage score across 5 eval scenarios
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is an excellent skill description that hits all the marks. It provides specific capabilities, comprehensive trigger terms that match natural user language, explicit 'Use when' and 'Triggers on' clauses, and a clear domain focus on web content that distinguishes it from other document-processing skills.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'Extract actionable insights', 'summarizing content', 'extracting key ideas', 'preserving code snippets and diagrams', 'creating visual summaries'. These are clear, actionable capabilities. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what (extract insights, summarize, preserve code/diagrams, create visual summaries) AND when with explicit 'Use when...' clause and 'Triggers on...' examples providing comprehensive guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Excellent coverage of natural user phrases: 'summarize this post', 'extract insights from', 'distill this article', 'what are the key takeaways', 'URL is shared for analysis'. These match how users naturally request this functionality. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Clear niche focused on web content analysis (posts, articles, URLs, technical documentation). The specific triggers like 'summarize this post' and URL-based analysis distinguish it from general document or code skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is an exemplary skill that demonstrates excellent token efficiency while providing comprehensive, actionable guidance. The security isolation section is particularly well-crafted with explicit pre-processing, analysis, and output boundary rules. The MoSCoW priority system and output templates give Claude clear, executable instructions without unnecessary explanation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is lean and efficient, using structured templates and brief annotations rather than verbose explanations. Every section serves a purpose with no unnecessary context about what content extraction is or how Claude should think about it. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste ready output templates with specific emoji markers, exact section headers, and clear formatting rules. The MoSCoW priority system gives explicit guidance on what to include/exclude, and diagram selection criteria are specific and actionable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear three-phase workflow (pre-processing → during analysis → output boundary) with explicit security checkpoints. The MoSCoW structure provides unambiguous sequencing for what to extract first, and validation steps for detecting prompt injection are explicit. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear visual hierarchy using emoji and dividers. The MoSCoW sections (MUST/SHOULD/COULD/WON'T) naturally structure content from essential to optional. For a self-contained skill of this scope, no external references are needed. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
Reviewed
Table of Contents