Progressive concept teaching through three depth levels (Core → Mechanics → Deep Dive). Creates diagrams, provides annotated code walkthroughs from the current codebase, and builds explanations from fundamentals to production internals. Triggers: "teach me about [pattern/concept]", "how does [architecture/pattern] work", "walk me through [this implementation]", "tutorial on [concept]", "deep dive into [system/pattern]", "help me understand [this design]" Use when: user requests multi-level learning about code patterns, architecture, or implementation mechanics with checkpoint-based progression. Not for: quick answers, single-sentence explanations, code fixes, or "what does this line do" questions—those are standard assistance.
98
Quality
100%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
97%
1.44xAverage score across 5 eval scenarios
{
"context": "Evaluate checkpoint handling: progression signals move to next level, exit signals end teaching, clarification stays at current level, skip signals jump levels, and ambiguous responses seek clarification.",
"type": "weighted_checklist",
"checklist": [
{
"name": "test-a-progresses-to-level-2",
"description": "Test Case A recognizes progression signal and moves to Level 2 (Mechanics)",
"max_score": 1
},
{
"name": "test-a-no-repetition",
"description": "Test Case A does not repeat Level 1 content, builds on it",
"max_score": 0.5
},
{
"name": "test-a-includes-checkpoint",
"description": "Test Case A ends with checkpoint for Level 2→3 transition",
"max_score": 0.5
},
{
"name": "test-b-exits-immediately",
"description": "Test Case B recognizes exit signal and exits teaching mode",
"max_score": 1
},
{
"name": "test-b-brief-acknowledgment",
"description": "Test Case B provides brief acknowledgment without continuing teaching",
"max_score": 1
},
{
"name": "test-b-no-checkpoint",
"description": "Test Case B does NOT include a checkpoint (teaching is done)",
"max_score": 0.5
},
{
"name": "test-c-stays-at-level-1",
"description": "Test Case C stays at Level 1 to clarify the specific confusion",
"max_score": 1
},
{
"name": "test-c-addresses-specific-point",
"description": "Test Case C specifically addresses 'why order matters' concern",
"max_score": 1
},
{
"name": "test-c-re-offers-checkpoint",
"description": "Test Case C re-offers checkpoint after clarification",
"max_score": 0.5
},
{
"name": "test-d-skips-to-level-3",
"description": "Test Case D skips Level 2 and goes directly to Level 3 (Deep Dive)",
"max_score": 1
},
{
"name": "test-d-acknowledges-skip",
"description": "Test Case D acknowledges user's existing knowledge before diving deep",
"max_score": 0.25
},
{
"name": "test-e-seeks-clarification",
"description": "Test Case E recognizes ambiguity and asks if user wants to continue or is done",
"max_score": 1
},
{
"name": "test-e-offers-explicit-options",
"description": "Test Case E offers explicit options: continue to mechanics or move on",
"max_score": 0.5
}
]
}Install with Tessl CLI
npx tessl i neomatrix369/learning-opportunity@0.1.0evals
scenario-1
scenario-2
scenario-3
scenario-4
scenario-5