odyssey4me/google-docs
Create and modify Google Docs documents. Read content, insert tables, apply heading styles, and manage formatting. Use when asked to edit a gdoc, write a Google document, update a doc, or format document content.
89
89%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Risky
Do not use without reviewing
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a well-crafted skill description that follows best practices. It uses third person voice, lists specific capabilities, includes natural trigger terms with common variations (including 'gdoc'), and explicitly states both what the skill does and when to use it. The description is concise yet comprehensive.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'Create and modify Google Docs documents. Read content, insert tables, apply heading styles, and manage formatting.' These are clear, actionable capabilities. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('Create and modify Google Docs documents. Read content, insert tables, apply heading styles, and manage formatting') AND when ('Use when asked to edit a gdoc, write a Google document, update a doc, or format document content'). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes natural keywords users would say: 'gdoc', 'Google document', 'doc', 'format document content'. Covers common variations including the informal 'gdoc' abbreviation. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Clear niche focused specifically on Google Docs with distinct triggers like 'gdoc' and 'Google document'. Unlikely to conflict with generic document or other office suite skills due to explicit Google Docs focus. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured, highly actionable skill with excellent command documentation and clear external references. The main weaknesses are moderate verbosity in output examples and missing validation checkpoints in multi-step workflows, particularly for destructive operations like content deletion.
Suggestions
Add explicit validation steps to multi-step workflows (e.g., 'Read document back to verify changes before proceeding' after content modifications)
Trim verbose output examples - showing '# Output:' for simple success messages adds little value
Add a verification step before content delete operations, such as reading the target range first to confirm what will be deleted
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is reasonably efficient but includes some redundancy (e.g., repeated explanations of document IDs, verbose output examples for simple commands). Some sections like 'Setup Verification' and 'check' command overlap in describing the same validation steps. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Excellent actionability with fully executable bash commands, complete with arguments, options, and realistic output examples. Every command shows exact syntax and practical usage patterns that are copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Multi-step examples exist (create and populate a document) but lack explicit validation checkpoints. The 'Edit existing content' workflow doesn't include verification steps between operations, and there's no guidance on checking results before proceeding with destructive operations like content delete. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-structured with clear sections, appropriate external references (OAuth setup guides, formatting reference, permissions.md), and one-level-deep navigation. Quick Start is concise, with detailed command reference following logically. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
Reviewed
Table of Contents