odyssey4me/google-sheets
Read, write, and format Google Sheets spreadsheets. Manage cell values, ranges, formulas, pivot tables, and charts. Use when asked to update a gsheet, edit a Google spreadsheet, add formulas, or work with spreadsheet data.
89
89%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Risky
Do not use without reviewing
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a strong skill description that covers all key dimensions well. It lists specific capabilities, includes natural trigger terms with common variations (including the informal 'gsheet'), explicitly states when to use it, and is clearly scoped to Google Sheets to avoid conflicts with similar spreadsheet-related skills.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: read, write, format, manage cell values, ranges, formulas, pivot tables, and charts. This covers a comprehensive set of capabilities. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (read, write, format spreadsheets; manage cell values, ranges, formulas, pivot tables, charts) and 'when' with an explicit 'Use when...' clause listing specific trigger scenarios. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes strong natural trigger terms users would say: 'gsheet', 'Google spreadsheet', 'formulas', 'spreadsheet data', 'Google Sheets', 'pivot tables', 'charts'. Covers common variations including the informal 'gsheet'. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Clearly scoped to Google Sheets specifically, distinguishing it from generic spreadsheet or Excel skills. Terms like 'gsheet' and 'Google spreadsheet' create a distinct niche unlikely to conflict with other skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a solid, comprehensive CLI reference skill with excellent actionability — every command has executable examples with expected output. The main weaknesses are moderate verbosity (repeated information, explanations that could be trimmed) and missing validation checkpoints in multi-step and destructive workflows. Progressive disclosure is handled well with appropriate external references.
Suggestions
Add explicit validation steps in multi-step workflows (e.g., after values write, read back to confirm; after values clear in batch operations, verify before writing new data)
Reduce verbosity by removing duplicate information — e.g., the dependency list appears in both Installation and Setup Verification, and the check command's validation items are listed twice
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is fairly well-structured but verbose in places — the setup verification section repeats dependency names already listed in installation, many commands have redundant argument descriptions alongside examples that already demonstrate usage, and the check command's validation list is stated twice. Could be tightened by ~30%. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Every command includes fully executable bash examples with concrete arguments, expected output, and proper JSON escaping. The examples section provides complete end-to-end workflows (create, populate, read, formulas, batch operations) that are copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The examples section shows multi-step workflows (create → write → append → read), but there are no explicit validation checkpoints between steps. The batch operations example clears data destructively without any verification step, and there's no feedback loop for confirming writes succeeded before proceeding. The error handling section is good but separate from the workflows themselves. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized with clear sections, and appropriately references external files for deeper content: permissions.md, range-notation.md, formulas-guide.md, OAuth setup guides, and GCP project setup. References are one level deep and clearly signaled with descriptive links. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
Reviewed
Table of Contents