CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

odyssey4me/google-sheets

Read, write, and format Google Sheets spreadsheets. Manage cell values, ranges, formulas, pivot tables, and charts. Use when asked to update a gsheet, edit a Google spreadsheet, add formulas, or work with spreadsheet data.

71

Quality

89%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Risky

Do not use without reviewing

Overview
Quality
Evals
Security
Files

Quality

Discovery

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is a strong skill description that clearly communicates specific capabilities, includes natural trigger terms with common variations (including the informal 'gsheet'), and explicitly states both what the skill does and when to use it. It is well-scoped to Google Sheets, making it easily distinguishable from other spreadsheet-related skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'Read, write, and format', 'Manage cell values, ranges, formulas, pivot tables, and charts'. These are concrete, actionable capabilities.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both what ('Read, write, and format Google Sheets spreadsheets. Manage cell values, ranges, formulas, pivot tables, and charts.') and when ('Use when asked to update a gsheet, edit a Google spreadsheet, add formulas, or work with spreadsheet data.').

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes strong natural keywords users would say: 'gsheet', 'Google spreadsheet', 'Google Sheets', 'formulas', 'spreadsheet data', 'pivot tables', 'charts'. Covers common variations including the informal 'gsheet'.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clearly scoped to Google Sheets specifically, distinguishing it from generic spreadsheet or Excel skills. The 'gsheet' and 'Google spreadsheet' terms create a distinct niche unlikely to conflict with other skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Implementation

72%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a well-structured, highly actionable skill with comprehensive command documentation and concrete examples. Its main weakness is verbosity — redundant descriptions of the check command, repeated output patterns, and some sections that could be consolidated. Adding validation checkpoints for destructive/batch operations would strengthen the workflow clarity.

Suggestions

Consolidate the 'Setup Verification' section into the 'check' command section to eliminate redundancy — the check command is described in three separate places.

Add explicit verification steps after destructive operations in the batch operations example (e.g., read back data after clear+write to confirm success before proceeding).

Trim verbose output examples — showing output once for a representative command is sufficient rather than repeating similar '✓ Success' patterns for every command.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The skill is fairly comprehensive but includes redundant information — the 'check' command is described three times (setup verification, quick start, and commands section), and many command examples repeat the same patterns with verbose output blocks. Some sections like 'Setup Verification' explaining what the check command checks are unnecessary given the command section covers it.

2 / 3

Actionability

Every command has fully executable, copy-paste ready bash examples with concrete arguments, options, and expected output. The examples section provides realistic multi-step workflows with actual commands. JSON value formatting, formula syntax, and A1 notation are all demonstrated concretely.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The 'Create and populate a spreadsheet' example shows a clear multi-step sequence, and the error handling section distinguishes retryable vs non-retryable errors well. However, the batch operations example clears data without any verification step, and there's no explicit validation checkpoint after destructive operations like 'values clear' or 'sheets delete' — the scoring notes specify missing feedback loops for batch/destructive operations should cap at 2.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The skill provides a clear overview with well-signaled references to external files (references/permissions.md, references/range-notation.md, references/formulas-guide.md) and external documentation links. Content is appropriately split between the main skill file and reference materials, with one-level-deep navigation.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Reviewed

Table of Contents