Read, write, and format Google Sheets spreadsheets. Manage cell values, ranges, formulas, pivot tables, and charts. Use when asked to update a gsheet, edit a Google spreadsheet, add formulas, or work with spreadsheet data.
71
89%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
—
No eval scenarios have been run
Risky
Do not use without reviewing
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a strong skill description that clearly communicates specific capabilities, includes natural trigger terms with common variations (including the informal 'gsheet'), and explicitly states both what the skill does and when to use it. It is well-scoped to Google Sheets, making it easily distinguishable from other spreadsheet-related skills.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'Read, write, and format', 'Manage cell values, ranges, formulas, pivot tables, and charts'. These are concrete, actionable capabilities. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('Read, write, and format Google Sheets spreadsheets. Manage cell values, ranges, formulas, pivot tables, and charts.') and when ('Use when asked to update a gsheet, edit a Google spreadsheet, add formulas, or work with spreadsheet data.'). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes strong natural keywords users would say: 'gsheet', 'Google spreadsheet', 'Google Sheets', 'formulas', 'spreadsheet data', 'pivot tables', 'charts'. Covers common variations including the informal 'gsheet'. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Clearly scoped to Google Sheets specifically, distinguishing it from generic spreadsheet or Excel skills. The 'gsheet' and 'Google spreadsheet' terms create a distinct niche unlikely to conflict with other skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured, highly actionable skill with comprehensive command documentation and concrete examples. Its main weakness is verbosity — redundant descriptions of the check command, repeated output patterns, and some sections that could be consolidated. Adding validation checkpoints for destructive/batch operations would strengthen the workflow clarity.
Suggestions
Consolidate the 'Setup Verification' section into the 'check' command section to eliminate redundancy — the check command is described in three separate places.
Add explicit verification steps after destructive operations in the batch operations example (e.g., read back data after clear+write to confirm success before proceeding).
Trim verbose output examples — showing output once for a representative command is sufficient rather than repeating similar '✓ Success' patterns for every command.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is fairly comprehensive but includes redundant information — the 'check' command is described three times (setup verification, quick start, and commands section), and many command examples repeat the same patterns with verbose output blocks. Some sections like 'Setup Verification' explaining what the check command checks are unnecessary given the command section covers it. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Every command has fully executable, copy-paste ready bash examples with concrete arguments, options, and expected output. The examples section provides realistic multi-step workflows with actual commands. JSON value formatting, formula syntax, and A1 notation are all demonstrated concretely. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 'Create and populate a spreadsheet' example shows a clear multi-step sequence, and the error handling section distinguishes retryable vs non-retryable errors well. However, the batch operations example clears data without any verification step, and there's no explicit validation checkpoint after destructive operations like 'values clear' or 'sheets delete' — the scoring notes specify missing feedback loops for batch/destructive operations should cap at 2. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill provides a clear overview with well-signaled references to external files (references/permissions.md, references/range-notation.md, references/formulas-guide.md) and external documentation links. Content is appropriately split between the main skill file and reference materials, with one-level-deep navigation. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
Reviewed
Table of Contents