Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured skill with excellent workflow clarity and progressive disclosure. The 5-phase evaluation pipeline is clearly sequenced with validation gates, and the output format is precisely specified with copy-paste-ready templates. Minor verbosity in scope-limiting statements and some behavioral constraints that Claude could infer prevent a perfect conciseness score.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient but includes some unnecessary scaffolding language (e.g., 'Evaluation only — no editing, ranking, or CLI execution' and 'Refuse non-AIE26 skills and contest logistics questions' are behavioral constraints Claude could infer). The phase structure adds overhead but serves organizational purpose. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Highly actionable with concrete checklists (structural checks with checkboxes), a specific scoring formula ('round((sum of 8 scores / 24) * 100)'), exact output format templates with table structures, and clear score scales (1-3). Claude knows exactly what to produce. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 5-phase workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit gates (Phase 2 structural check must pass before Phase 3 scoring), a short-file bypass path, and clear conditional logic ('If any check fails: Report each failure... Do NOT proceed'). Each phase has defined inputs and outputs. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Appropriately delegates detailed rubric criteria to 'references/scoring-rubric.md' and calibration examples to 'references/example-evaluation.md', keeping the main skill as an overview with clear one-level-deep references. Content is well-split between the overview workflow and reference materials. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |