The body is lean with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, tight WHY/BAD/GOOD anti-patterns, and raw commands without padding. It is not a 2 because there is no unnecessary explanatory prose that could be tightened.

It provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands ("rg --files", "find . -name AGENTS.md", "bunx markdownlint-cli2", "bun run lint") plus a concrete minimal template. It is not a 2 because the guidance is real and runnable rather than pseudocode or incomplete.

The 5-step workflow pairs each step with an explicit "Output:" line, and a Verification section supplies a validate-then-fix feedback loop. It is not a 2 because validation checkpoints are present and explicit rather than implicit or missing.

The body is a clear overview with a well-signaled, one-level-deep References table linking to scoped template files. It is not a 2 because references are clearly signaled and content is appropriately split rather than dumped inline.

Quotes multiple concrete actions ("Create and maintain AGENTS.md documentation", "deterministic discovery, scoped instruction files, low-token navigation"), matching the anchor for listing several specific actions. It is not a 2 because the action set is comprehensive rather than a partial naming of the domain.

It states what the skill does ("Create and maintain AGENTS.md documentation...") and gives an explicit "use when..." clause answering when to use it. It is not a 2 because the when-trigger is explicit rather than missing or merely implied.

Natural phrasings a user would say appear ("use when generating AGENTS.md, updating agent docs"), giving good coverage of common variations. It is not a 2 because it supplies several natural trigger terms, not just one generic keyword.

It targets a clear niche (AGENTS.md documentation) with distinct triggers unlikely to overlap other skills. It is not a 2 because the scope is specific to a named doc format rather than broadly overlapping similar skills.