pantheon-ai/implementation-plan-splitter
Merged into implementation-planner. Redirects to the unified skill that handles both creating new plans and restructuring existing monolithic planning docs into hierarchical directory structures.
63
63%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
22%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This description functions as a deprecation/redirect notice rather than a proper skill description. It fails to describe concrete capabilities, lacks explicit trigger guidance, and doesn't help Claude understand when to select this skill - instead directing to 'implementation-planner'. If this skill is deprecated, it should either be removed or the description should clearly state it's deprecated with proper redirect logic.
Suggestions
If this skill is deprecated, consider removing it entirely or adding a clear 'DEPRECATED:' prefix and explicit redirect instructions for Claude's skill selection logic.
If this skill should still be selectable, rewrite to describe concrete actions (e.g., 'Restructures monolithic planning documents into hierarchical directory structures with organized subdirectories') with a 'Use when...' clause.
Add natural trigger terms users would say, such as 'reorganize plans', 'split planning document', 'create directory structure from plan'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | The description contains no concrete actions - it only references another skill and vaguely mentions 'creating new plans' and 'restructuring existing monolithic planning documents' without specifying what actions are performed. | 1 / 3 |
Completeness | This is a redirect/deprecation notice, not a functional skill description. It doesn't answer 'what does this do' (only says use another skill) and has no explicit 'Use when...' clause. | 1 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Contains some relevant terms like 'plans', 'planning documents', 'hierarchical directory structures', but these are embedded in a redirect notice rather than presented as natural trigger terms users would say. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The mention of 'implementation-planner' and 'hierarchical directory structures' provides some distinctiveness, but the description's purpose is to redirect rather than distinguish this skill's unique capabilities. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 6 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-crafted deprecation/redirect notice rather than an active skill. It efficiently communicates that functionality has been consolidated elsewhere, provides clear links, and lists what was merged. However, as a skill body it provides no actual instructional content - it's purely a pointer.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is extremely lean - it's a redirect notice that efficiently communicates the skill has been merged elsewhere. Every token serves the purpose of directing users to the correct location. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides a clear pointer to the replacement skill and mentions 'Mode 2', but doesn't explain what Mode 2 is or how to invoke it. The actionable guidance is essentially 'go elsewhere'. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | For a redirect/deprecation notice, the workflow is unambiguous: this skill is deprecated, use the other one. No multi-step process exists here that would require validation checkpoints. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Appropriately structured as a brief notice with clear links to the canonical location. Lists what functionality moved without duplicating the actual content. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
Reviewed
Table of Contents