Content
92%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, highly actionable, and workflows are clearly sequenced with validation checkpoints. Its main weakness is progressive disclosure: multiple referenced references and scripts are absent from the bundle, leaving dangling links.
Suggestions
Add the missing bundle files referenced in the body (references/tile-json-schema.md, references/anti-patterns.md, references/public-publication-requirements.md, scripts/check-publication-readiness.sh) so the signaled navigation actually resolves.
Alternatively, inline the essential rules from the missing references directly in SKILL.md and remove the broken links rather than pointing to non-existent files.
If scripts/check-publication-readiness.sh is intended to be created by the user, state that explicitly instead of presenting it as an existing artifact.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient: concrete commands with minimal preamble and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; nearly every token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable bash commands (evaluate.sh, tessl skill publish --public), a concrete tile.json template, and explicit eval-scenario file requirements — copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear six-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (re-audit if below A-grade, check-publication-readiness.sh before publish) and a feedback loop on the audit step. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized and references are clearly signaled one level deep, but the referenced bundle files (references/tile-json-schema.md, references/anti-patterns.md, references/public-publication-requirements.md, scripts/check-publication-readiness.sh) do not exist, so navigation is broken. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |