pantheon-ai/tessl-publish-public
Ensure Tessl tiles meet all requirements for public registry publishing with comprehensive validation, quality gates, and evaluation scenarios. Use when preparing skills for public Tessl release, validating tile.json configuration, creating evaluation scenarios, enforcing quality thresholds, or checking agent-agnostic compliance. Keywords: tessl, tile, publishing, public-registry, validation, quality-gates, tile.json, evaluation-scenarios, skill-publishing
94
94%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a strong, well-crafted description that clearly defines a specific domain (Tessl tile publication validation) with concrete actions and explicit trigger conditions. It uses third person voice correctly, includes specific technical details like quality thresholds and field names, and provides comprehensive 'Use when...' guidance that would help Claude accurately select this skill.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'validating tile.json configuration', 'creating evaluation scenarios', 'checking quality thresholds (≥108/120 A-grade)', 'validates eval scenario coverage', and specific fields like 'name, version, private, summary, skills'. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('comprehensive validation', 'validates eval scenario coverage, tile.json fields...') AND when ('Use when publishing skills to public registry, validating tile.json configuration, creating evaluation scenarios...'). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes natural keywords users would say: 'publishing skills', 'public registry', 'tile.json', 'validation', 'quality thresholds', 'A-grade', 'publication readiness', 'eval scenario'. Good coverage of domain-specific terms. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Very specific niche around Tessl tiles and public registry publication. Distinct triggers like 'tile.json', 'public registry', '≥108/120 A-grade', and 'agent-agnostic compliance' make it unlikely to conflict with other skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured, actionable skill with clear workflows and appropriate progressive disclosure. The main weakness is moderate verbosity - the scope table, some repeated threshold mentions, and the anti-patterns summary could be condensed. Overall, it provides excellent guidance for public publication with concrete commands and validation checkpoints.
Suggestions
Remove or condense the scope table - the 'Not applicable for' note already covers exclusions, and the table adds ~15 lines of marginal value
Consolidate threshold mentions (≥108/120, ≥90%) into a single 'Quality Gates' section rather than repeating throughout
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is reasonably efficient but includes some redundancy (e.g., the scope table, repeated explanations of quality thresholds, and verbose anti-patterns section that could be shorter). The gotchas and production caveats sections add value but could be tighter. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable bash commands, specific file paths, concrete JSON examples, and copy-paste ready templates. The eval scenario template and quick commands section are immediately usable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 6-step workflow with explicit validation checkpoints (quality gate at step 1, target thresholds at step 4, final readiness check at step 6). Includes feedback loops for remediation when below threshold. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-structured with clear overview, detailed workflow steps, quick commands for reference, and appropriate delegation to reference files (tile-json-schema.md, anti-patterns.md, public-publication-requirements.md). Navigation is clear and one-level deep. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
Reviewed
Table of Contents