Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured, actionable skill with clear workflows and appropriate progressive disclosure. The main weakness is moderate verbosity - the scope table, some repeated threshold mentions, and the anti-patterns summary could be condensed. Overall, it provides excellent guidance for public publication with concrete commands and validation checkpoints.
Suggestions
Remove or condense the scope table - the 'Not applicable for' note already covers exclusions, and the table adds ~15 lines of marginal value
Consolidate threshold mentions (≥108/120, ≥90%) into a single 'Quality Gates' section rather than repeating throughout
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is reasonably efficient but includes some redundancy (e.g., the scope table, repeated explanations of quality thresholds, and verbose anti-patterns section that could be shorter). The gotchas and production caveats sections add value but could be tighter. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable bash commands, specific file paths, concrete JSON examples, and copy-paste ready templates. The eval scenario template and quick commands section are immediately usable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 6-step workflow with explicit validation checkpoints (quality gate at step 1, target thresholds at step 4, final readiness check at step 6). Includes feedback loops for remediation when below threshold. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-structured with clear overview, detailed workflow steps, quick commands for reference, and appropriate delegation to reference files (tile-json-schema.md, anti-patterns.md, public-publication-requirements.md). Navigation is clear and one-level deep. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |