This is a strong skill description that excels across all dimensions. It clearly specifies the tool (Cubic CLI), the concrete actions (detect bugs, security vulnerabilities, style issues), and provides an extensive set of natural trigger terms in an explicit 'Use when' clause. The description is well-structured, uses third person voice, and is distinctive enough to avoid conflicts with other skills.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'detect bugs, security vulnerabilities, and style issues in local changes' and specifies the tool (Cubic CLI). Clear about what it does.	3 / 3
Completeness	Clearly answers both 'what' (run AI-powered code reviews using Cubic CLI to detect bugs, security vulnerabilities, and style issues) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when' clause with extensive trigger phrases and a 'Triggers on' clause).	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Excellent coverage of natural trigger terms users would say: 'review my code,' 'check my changes for bugs,' 'run cubic review,' 'review this diff,' 'pre-commit check,' 'find issues before I push,' 'analyze my branch changes,' 'code quality check,' plus additional keyword mentions like 'cubic,' 'diff review,' 'bug detection.'	3 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Highly distinctive due to the specific tool name 'Cubic CLI' and the focused scope on local changes/diffs. The combination of the specific tool and the pre-commit/diff review context makes it unlikely to conflict with generic code review or linting skills.	3 / 3
	Total	12 / 12 Passed

Implementation

92%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a well-crafted skill that is concise, actionable, and has a clear workflow with proper validation loops. The CLI commands are specific and copy-paste ready, the JSON output format provides a concrete schema, and the workflow includes both human approval checkpoints and re-verification. The only minor weakness is the reference to `/cubic:review` without supporting bundle files to back it up.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The content is lean and efficient. It avoids explaining what code review is or how CLI tools work. Every section serves a purpose—prerequisites, CLI reference, output format, and workflow are all tightly written without padding.	3 / 3
Actionability	Provides specific, executable CLI commands with flags, a concrete JSON output schema, installation commands, and a clear step-by-step workflow. The mutual exclusivity constraint on flags is a useful concrete detail.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	The 7-step workflow is clearly sequenced with a verification/re-run step at the end (step 7), includes a human approval checkpoint before applying fixes (step 5), and covers the full loop from review to fix to re-verify.	3 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	The skill references `/cubic:review` for the full command reference, which is good progressive disclosure. However, no bundle files are provided to support this reference, and the skill itself is relatively self-contained without clear signaling of what additional content exists beyond that single reference.	2 / 3
	Total	11 / 12 Passed

Validation

90%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
allowed_tools_field	'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)	Warning

	Total	10 / 11 Passed

Reviewed

1 day ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation