Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-crafted safety/constraint skill that is concise, clear, and appropriately scoped. Its main strength is the unambiguous, absolute nature of the constraint with explicit handling of the edge case where a user demands changes. A minor improvement could be adding example refusal language or a short list of example prohibited command patterns.
Suggestions
Consider adding 1-2 example refusal responses to make the behavioral expectation even more concrete (e.g., how to phrase the insistence that the user perform changes themselves).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is very lean and every sentence serves a purpose — defining the constraint, emphasizing its absoluteness, and covering edge cases (user demands, scope of 'changes'). No unnecessary explanation of what AWS CLI is or how it works. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | The constraint is clearly stated and the behavioral directive is concrete (never change anything, insist user does it themselves or removes the skill). However, it lacks specific examples of what commands to refuse or how to phrase the refusal, which would make it more actionable. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a simple, single-purpose constraint skill with no multi-step process. The single behavioral rule is unambiguous: never perform changes, and if pressed, insist the user does it or removes the skill. The escalation path is clear. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | For a skill under 50 lines with a single clear purpose, no external references are needed. The content is well-organized with the core rule stated first and then elaborated with scope and edge cases. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |