Content
73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable skill body with a clear validated workflow and good external reference handling. Main weaknesses are moderate cross-section repetition and inlined specification detail that could be further externalized.
Suggestions
Consolidate the overlapping prohibitions between 'Non-Negotiable Boundaries', 'Controlled Evidence Rules', and the validation failure list into a single canonical ruleset referenced once.
Move the detailed per-section format rules (e.g., Section 12 column layout, row-size limits) into references/specification-template.md and link to them from the body.
Add one literal, fully-substituted example command run (with sample tenant/project/module values) alongside the templated invocations to lower the barrier to first execution.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense and free of basic-concept padding, but themes recur across Non-Negotiable Boundaries, Controlled Evidence Rules, and the validation failure list, so it could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete script invocations with flags, exact paths, section formats, and a real screenshot markdown example, but commands use placeholders requiring substitution and no literal end-to-end run is shown. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 7-step workflow with an explicit validation checkpoint (guard + git diff --check) and a fix-then-re-run feedback loop for a controlled-evidence write operation. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Six real reference files and scripts are clearly signaled one level deep under 'Required References' with bulk template/contract content externalized, though the body still inlines sizable specification detail that could live in references. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |