Use when the user wants a landing page audit, CRO review, marketing conversion review, copy audit, funnel alignment check, brand positioning critique, technical performance marketing audit, or prioritized issue report for a landing page, pricing page, signup page, lead magnet, or product page. Runs evidence-first context gathering, parallel specialist analysis, synthesis, and severity-ranked recommendations.
100
100%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
100%
1.81xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a strong skill description that clearly defines its niche in landing page and conversion marketing audits. It excels at providing comprehensive trigger terms that match natural user language, explicitly states both what the skill does and when to use it, and occupies a distinct enough domain to avoid conflicts with other skills. The description is well-structured and information-dense without being padded.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'evidence-first context gathering, parallel specialist analysis, synthesis, and severity-ranked recommendations.' Also names specific page types (landing page, pricing page, signup page, lead magnet, product page) and audit types (CRO review, copy audit, funnel alignment check, brand positioning critique, technical performance marketing audit). | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Explicitly answers both 'what' (runs evidence-first context gathering, parallel specialist analysis, synthesis, and severity-ranked recommendations) and 'when' (opens with 'Use when the user wants...' followed by a comprehensive list of trigger scenarios). The 'Use when' clause is explicit and detailed. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Excellent coverage of natural terms users would say: 'landing page audit', 'CRO review', 'marketing conversion review', 'copy audit', 'funnel alignment check', 'brand positioning critique', 'pricing page', 'signup page', 'lead magnet', 'product page'. These are terms a marketer or product owner would naturally use. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive with a clear niche in landing page and conversion-focused marketing audits. The combination of specific page types, audit methodologies, and marketing-specific terminology makes it very unlikely to conflict with other skills like general code review, SEO audits, or generic document analysis. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is an exceptionally well-structured skill that balances conciseness with completeness. It provides concrete, actionable guidance through executable commands, structured templates, and clear classification tables while delegating detailed phase instructions to reference files. The workflow is clearly sequenced with appropriate validation checkpoints and fallback logic for ambiguous inputs.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill is lean and efficient. It avoids explaining what landing pages are, what CRO means, or how marketing audits work conceptually. Every section serves a functional purpose—input handling, workflow phases, severity definitions, finding templates. No wasted tokens on things Claude already knows. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable commands (rg patterns for context gathering), specific templates for findings, a clear severity scale with definitions, a quick triage classification table, and exact report structure requirements. The finding contract is copy-paste ready and the first actions include real bash commands. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The four-phase workflow is clearly sequenced in a table with references to detailed phase files. Validation is addressed through guardrails in phase 4, the severity scale provides clear classification criteria, and the report contract serves as a final validation checklist. The Quick Triage section handles ambiguous inputs with explicit fallback logic (cold-traffic default, when to ask the user). | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The SKILL.md serves as a clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references to four specific files (context-gathering.md, specialist-agents.md, synthesis-report.md, guardrails-decision-logic.md). The instruction to 'open only the files needed for the current phase' is excellent token management. Content is appropriately split between the overview and reference files. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
Reviewed
Table of Contents