sharaf/landing-page-audit
Use when the user wants a landing page audit, CRO review, marketing conversion review, copy audit, funnel alignment check, brand positioning critique, technical performance marketing audit, or prioritized issue report for a landing page, pricing page, signup page, lead magnet, or product page. Runs evidence-first context gathering, parallel specialist analysis, synthesis, and severity-ranked recommendations.
100
100%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
100%
1.81xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Passed
No known issues
Evaluation results
100%
51%Landing Page Audit: ProjectFlow
Full audit report from source-code-only access
Copy & Messaging section
100%
100%
CRO & UX section
100%
100%
Brand & Positioning section
100%
100%
Technical Performance section
100%
100%
Funnel Alignment section
75%
100%
Finding: label present
0%
100%
Evidence: label present
0%
100%
Why it matters: label present
0%
100%
Suggested fix: label present
0%
100%
Severity: label present
0%
100%
What's Working Well section
0%
100%
Severity-sorted issue list
100%
100%
Narrative executive summary
100%
100%
Evidence gaps stated
40%
100%
Cold-traffic assumption
100%
100%
No visual hallucinations
100%
100%
100%
27%CloudSecure Pricing Page Conversion Audit
Pricing page audit with ad cohesion
Pricing page classification
100%
100%
Bottom-funnel stage stated
0%
100%
Ad copy cohesion checked
100%
100%
Ad headline mismatch flagged
100%
100%
Navigation presence flagged
100%
100%
Form field count flagged
87%
100%
Generic CTA flagged
100%
100%
Finding blocks with exact labels
0%
100%
Severity correctly applied
100%
100%
Source-only limitation stated
20%
100%
Cold-traffic or known-traffic assumption
60%
100%
No fabricated statistics
100%
100%
What's Working Well section
20%
100%
Severity-sorted issue list
100%
100%
No visual hallucinations
100%
100%
100%
33%DataPulse Webinar Registration Page Audit
Lead magnet quality and URL inference audit
URL inferred from package.json
0%
100%
Lead magnet / top-funnel classification
100%
100%
Webinar quality assessment
75%
100%
Jargon / reading level flagged
100%
100%
Form field count flagged
87%
100%
Generic CTA flagged
100%
100%
Post-conversion experience reviewed
100%
100%
Cold-traffic readiness assessed
75%
100%
Missing alt text flagged
75%
100%
Finding blocks with exact labels
0%
100%
Source-only limitation stated
0%
100%
No visual hallucinations
100%
100%
What's Working Well section
0%
100%
Severity-sorted issue list
100%
100%
- Evaluated
- Agent
- Claude Code
- Model
- Claude Sonnet 4.6