Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tightly written methodology skill: lean yet substantive, highly actionable with concrete commands and templates, a clearly sequenced workflow with validation checkpoints, and exemplary progressive disclosure via real one-level references. No dimension shows meaningful weakness.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is information-dense and assumes Claude's competence — it never explains basic concepts Claude knows — and every block (commands, templates, thresholds) earns its place; specific figures like 'ad-blocker ~25–40%, consent decline ~50–55%' add value Claude would not reliably recall. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready, executable guidance: concrete `rg` scanning commands, an exact nine-field Journey Brief template, an exact Finding Contract markdown template, and a severity scale with measurable thresholds and examples. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A four-phase sequenced workflow table pairs with explicit validation checkpoints — gate analytics on instrumentation trust before believing numbers, assert a cause only with evidence, and read guardrails before finalizing — plus checklists (brief, finding, report) for the complex process. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview with well-signaled, one-level-deep references — all four referenced files (context-gathering, specialist-agents, synthesis-report, guardrails-decision-logic) exist in references/ — with core contracts kept inline and phase details split out for easy navigation. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |