Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable, packed with executable code and concrete parameter values, and well organized into clear numbered sections. Its main weakness is progressive disclosure: everything sits in one monolithic file, and the philosophical framing adds length without proportionate utility.
Suggestions
Move the deeper reference material (e.g. Typography, Materials & depth, Design foundations) into separate files under references/ and keep SKILL.md as a concise overview with clearly signaled one-level-deep links.
Trim the introductory philosophy paragraphs and the WWDC quote blocks that restate concepts a competent reader already has, keeping only the through-line that frames the concrete techniques.
Add a short Quick Reference / TL;DR near the top pointing to the most-used recipes (default spring, velocity handoff, reduced-motion) so the highest-value content is reachable before the long sections.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and dense with hard-won specifics (exact damping/response values, projection and rubber-band functions), but the opening framing, quoted maxims, and the "Core Idea"/four-human-needs philosophy add explanatory prose a competent reader could largely infer. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready, executable code throughout — CSS `:active` feedback, Pointer Events with `setPointerCapture`, Motion `animate(...)` spring calls, the `project()` and `rubberband()` functions — plus concrete value tables for damping/response. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a single-purpose reference/knowledge skill rather than a destructive multi-step workflow; the guidance is concrete and unambiguous (e.g. the gesture checklist, reduced-motion recipes), so under the simple-skills note a clear single task scores 3 with no validation gaps. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A well-organized 278-line single file with clear section headers, but no bundle files and no references split out — substantial self-contained topics (typography, materials & depth, design foundations) that could live one level deeper remain inline, so it is not a lean overview pointing outward. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |