Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The skill body is highly actionable with concrete paths, naming conventions, and templates, and its workflow is clearly sequenced with a completion checklist. Its main weaknesses are redundancy (two overlapping reference tables plus a worked example that repeats earlier templates) and end-only validation with no mid-workflow checkpoints.
Suggestions
Merge the Step 2 'Determine Integration Target' table and the 'Common Skill Integration Reference' table into a single table to remove the duplicated skill-to-target mapping.
Trim the 'Example: Integrating mcp-builder' section to only the parts not already shown (e.g., the instantiated doc.md section), dropping the repeated directory-structure listing.
Add an explicit validation step after 4.1–4.3, such as re-reading doc.md/index.md to confirm the @@@section markers and index rows are correctly placed, before generating the integration report.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is mostly project-specific convention rather than padded explanation, but the Step 2 integration-target table duplicates the "Common Skill Integration Reference" table, and the full mcp-builder worked example re-states the directory structure and section template already provided, so it could be meaningfully tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is copy-paste ready: exact paths (.trellis/spec/{target}/doc.md), file naming conventions (component.tsx.template), explicit section markers (@@@section:skill-<name>), an index row format, and a complete worked mcp-builder example covering a common case. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear six-step sequence is present with a fallback for missing skills and a Completed Changes checklist, but validation is only a final checkbox list — there is no checkpoint verifying that doc.md sections, index rows, or example files were written correctly before reporting. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, and the single-file body is well organized with clear headers, tables, and templates; the duplication between the two reference tables and the worked example leaves minor organization gaps that keep it from a top structure score. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |