Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a concise, highly actionable policy reference with concrete commands and specific values, organized into clean sections. Its only gap is the lack of an explicit sequenced validation workflow with feedback loops.
Suggestions
Add a short ordered workflow that sequences the validation commands as a feedback loop (e.g. '1. lint, 2. test, 3. if either fails fix imports/tags and re-run').
State the expected validation exit condition explicitly (e.g. 'Only proceed once lint and test pass for the affected project').
Optionally show one concrete migration example (before/after import + tag change) to anchor the placement and tag policies.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean set of bullets across four well-delimited sections with no concept explanation or padding; every line states a concrete path, alias, tag, or command. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives executable commands ('pnpm nx lint <project>', 'pnpm install --frozen-lockfile'), concrete aliases ('@iptvnator/services'), and specific tag values ('type:feature', 'type:data-access') that are copy-paste ready. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Policies and validation commands are listed, but there is no explicit validate -> fix -> retry sequence or checkpoint tying the lint/test commands into a feedback loop. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | At under 50 lines with no need for external references, the content is well organized into Project Shape, Import Policy, Tag Policy, and Validation sections, satisfying the simple-skill bar. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |