Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is concise and well-organized with concrete library/token references and a sensible checklist, but its validation and workflow steps are stated abstractly without explicit commands or error-recovery feedback loops, capping actionability and workflow clarity at 2. Adding exact Nx/Playwright commands and a retry-on-failure loop would lift both.
Suggestions
Replace abstract validation with concrete commands, e.g. the actual `nx test <project>` and Playwright target invocations rather than 'run the affected Nx project test target'.
Add an explicit error-recovery feedback loop in Validation (run → on failure inspect output → fix → re-run until green) for the destructive/batch UI changes the checklist covers.
Make the checklist steps more imperative and copy-paste ready where possible (e.g. exact grep/inspect commands for finding the nearest shared component).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean (~22 lines), assumes Claude's competence, and never over-explains Angular/Material concepts, matching 'Lean and efficient; every token earns its place'. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives concrete guidance (named libraries "@iptvnator/ui/components", "@iptvnator/portal/shared/ui", "@iptvnator/ui/epg" and "--app-selection-*" tokens) but validation targets are named abstractly rather than as copy-paste commands, fitting 'Some concrete guidance but incomplete'. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A numbered checklist gives a clear sequence and a Validation section exists, but checkpoints are implicit and there is no fix→retry feedback loop, matching 'Steps listed but validation gaps; checkpoints missing or implicit'. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no bundle files and well-organized named sections (Principles, Checklist, Validation) plus a single legitimate pointer to AGENTS.md, which per the guidelines lets progressive disclosure score 3 on well-organized sections alone. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |