Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A dense, well-structured design contract that respects the token budget and points clearly to inspect-first references with an explicit validation step. Adding a concrete code example and a validation failure/retry loop would round it out.
Suggestions
Include a small copy-paste code snippet illustrating the dense-row flex pattern (min-width: 0 + ellipsis, flex-shrink: 0) to push actionability toward 5.
Add an explicit "if validation fails → fix and re-run" feedback loop in the Validation section to reach the top workflow-clarity anchor.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient with no concept padding (no explanation of what Angular or EPG is); every directive and file reference earns its place and assumes Claude's competence. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, actionable guidance (exact CSS like min-width: 0 plus ellipsis, flex-shrink: 0, and commands like Playwright/Electron CDP), but as an instruction skill it lacks any copy-paste code block and some directives ("check every affected consumer") are abstract. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear Inspect → Design Contract → Validate sequence with an explicit validation checkpoint (run focused target + Playwright, record uncovered states), but no error-recovery feedback loop for failed validation. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview with well-signaled, one-level-deep references (policy doc, theme files, component directories, @iptvnator packages) under "Inspect First"; no nested references and content appropriately split. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |