Content
90%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-architected knowledge skill: concise, densely actionable with exact symbols and paths, and clearly sectioned with one-level-deep doc references and a concrete validation block. Its only gaps are the absence of explicit feedback-loop workflows and references formatted as plain text rather than links.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and dense with no padding: it never explains what Stalker/Ministra or EPG are, assumes Claude's competence, and every line states a contract, file location, or rule that earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly actionable: names exact predicates and functions ("isFullStalkerPortalPlaylist()", "executeStalkerRequest()", "isStalkerSeriesFlag()" accepting "true, 1, '1'"), exact library paths, and copy-paste validation commands ("pnpm nx test shared-interfaces"), covering the common cases concretely. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear Validation section sequences the test targets, and the destructive migration boundary has an explicit ordering safeguard ("save the scoped row before clearing a confirmed legacy row, and keep legacy progress when the save fails"); however the bulk is contractual reference rather than a multi-step process with explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loops, so it sits just below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly headed sections with a "Read First" block of one-level-deep doc references (docs/architecture/stalker-portal.md, stalker-epg.md, remote-control.md); references are plain paths rather than markdown links and there are no bundle files, keeping it just below the ideal 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |