Content
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exceptionally lean, executable git/PR workflow with clear placeholders and well-organized sections. Its only gap is the absence of explicit validation/verification checkpoints after the push and PR-creation steps, which keeps workflow clarity at anchor 2.
Suggestions
Add a validation checkpoint after pushing, e.g. run `git remote -v` again or confirm the upstream branch is set before opening the PR.
Add a verification step after `gh pr create`, e.g. check the returned PR URL or run `gh pr view` to confirm the PR was created against the correct base.
Note what to do if the pre-flight remote check fails (retry the set-url command or abort) to close the error-recovery loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean set of commands and brief notes with no conceptual padding or explanation of git basics Claude already knows, matching the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides concrete, executable bash commands with clearly delimited placeholders (<github-username>, <branch-name>, <type>), copy-paste ready, matching the 'fully executable code/commands; copy-paste ready' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence (pre-flight → branch → commit → push → PR) is clearly listed, but there is no explicit validation checkpoint after risky steps like push or PR creation (e.g. verifying the PR opened or the remote is correct), which per the rubric caps workflow clarity at 2. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a simple single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no need for external references, and its content is well-organized into clear sections (飞行前检查, 命令, 注意事项), so per the simple_skills note progressive disclosure scores 3. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |