Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a concise, well-structured instruction skill that gives concrete interview guidance and a clear workflow with confirmation checkpoints. It would benefit only slightly from explicit feedback-loop handling and a copy-paste example of an interview round.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient across ~50 lines with no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section (核心原则, 问题领域, 访谈流程) earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance is present — '2-4 questions per round via AskUserQuestion', specific probing categories, and an output path docs/specs/<feature-name>.md — but it stays at the level of direction rather than copy-paste-ready examples, so minor gaps remain. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step sequence is given with checkpoints ('定期总结以确认理解', '与用户确认并编写'), but explicit error-recovery/feedback loops are not spelled out, leaving minor validation gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with well-organized sections (概述/核心原则/问题领域/访谈流程/输出/调用) and no need for external bundle files, matching the rubric's simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |